Difference between revisions of "Lerner-Kitzinger2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Celia Kitzinger; |Title=Well-Prefacing in the Organization of Self-Initiated Repair |Tag(s)=EMCA; Well-prefaced; Self-in...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Celia Kitzinger; | |Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Celia Kitzinger; | ||
− | |Title=Well- | + | |Title=Well-prefacing in the organization of self-initiated repair |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Well-prefaced; Self-initiated repair | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Well-prefaced; Self-initiated repair | ||
|Key=Lerner-Kitzinger2019 | |Key=Lerner-Kitzinger2019 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=52 | |Volume=52 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=1–19 |
− | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376 |
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376 | ||
− | |Abstract=This report describes the use of well as a preface to repair solutions in self- | + | |Abstract=This report describes the use of well as a preface to repair solutions in self-initiated repair segments. It extends our previous work on repair prefacing, which showed that repair prefaces cast a relationship between a projected repair solution and its trouble source, with each preface type casting this relationship in a distinctive way. Based on analysis of our collection of 135 recorded instances of the phenomenon, we find that well-prefacing is a practice speakers use to overtly cast a repair solution as a noteworthy revision of the inadequate (but not wholly wrong) formulation it is moving away from. We then compare well-prefacing to no-prefacing and introduce the practice of double prefacing by describing well+no-prefacing. We conclude by describing three kinds of repair common among the well-prefaced repairs in our collection. Data are in British and American English. |
− | initiated repair segments. It extends our previous work on repair prefacing, | ||
− | which showed that repair prefaces cast a relationship between a projected | ||
− | repair solution and its trouble source, with each preface type casting this | ||
− | relationship in a distinctive way. Based on analysis of our collection of 135 | ||
− | recorded instances of the phenomenon, we find that well-prefacing is | ||
− | a practice speakers use to overtly cast a repair solution as a noteworthy | ||
− | revision of the inadequate (but not wholly wrong) formulation it is moving | ||
− | away from. We then compare well-prefacing to no-prefacing and introduce | ||
− | the practice of double prefacing by describing well+no-prefacing. We | ||
− | |||
− | repairs in our collection. Data are in British and American English. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 09:34, 17 January 2020
Lerner-Kitzinger2019 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Lerner-Kitzinger2019 |
Author(s) | Gene H. Lerner, Celia Kitzinger |
Title | Well-prefacing in the organization of self-initiated repair |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Well-prefaced, Self-initiated repair |
Publisher | |
Year | 2019 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
Volume | 52 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 1–19 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This report describes the use of well as a preface to repair solutions in self-initiated repair segments. It extends our previous work on repair prefacing, which showed that repair prefaces cast a relationship between a projected repair solution and its trouble source, with each preface type casting this relationship in a distinctive way. Based on analysis of our collection of 135 recorded instances of the phenomenon, we find that well-prefacing is a practice speakers use to overtly cast a repair solution as a noteworthy revision of the inadequate (but not wholly wrong) formulation it is moving away from. We then compare well-prefacing to no-prefacing and introduce the practice of double prefacing by describing well+no-prefacing. We conclude by describing three kinds of repair common among the well-prefaced repairs in our collection. Data are in British and American English.
Notes