Difference between revisions of "Voutilainen-etal2019"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Liisa Voutilainen; Pentti Henttonen; Melisa Stevanovic; Mikko Kahri; Anssi Peräkylä; |Title=Nods, vocal continuers, and the perception...")
 
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=56
 
|Volume=56
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
|Pages=310-330
+
|Pages=310–330
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1498670
+
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1498670
 
|DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2018.1498670
 
|DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2018.1498670
 
|Abstract=In her influential paper on stance, alignment, and affiliation in conversational storytelling, Tanya Stivers argued that two basic conversational means of receiving a story, nods and vocal continuers, differ in their function: whereas vocal continuers display alignment with the telling activity, nods, during the mid-telling, convey affiliation with the storytellers’ affective stance. In this paper, we elaborate these insights on the basis of a quantitative study informed by conversation analysis. Using a database of 317 stories told in Finnish, we analyzed how story recipients’ nods and continuers in different phases of storytelling (before and after the story climax) predict naïve raters’ judgments of the story recipients’ empathy toward the storyteller. We found that vocal continuers accounted for the perception of empathy during mid-telling, whereas the effect of nods remained weak. The study offers further support to the notion of structural organization of storytelling, and suggests that the significance of vocal continuers as a vehicle of empathy may be greater than has been generally thought of.
 
|Abstract=In her influential paper on stance, alignment, and affiliation in conversational storytelling, Tanya Stivers argued that two basic conversational means of receiving a story, nods and vocal continuers, differ in their function: whereas vocal continuers display alignment with the telling activity, nods, during the mid-telling, convey affiliation with the storytellers’ affective stance. In this paper, we elaborate these insights on the basis of a quantitative study informed by conversation analysis. Using a database of 317 stories told in Finnish, we analyzed how story recipients’ nods and continuers in different phases of storytelling (before and after the story climax) predict naïve raters’ judgments of the story recipients’ empathy toward the storyteller. We found that vocal continuers accounted for the perception of empathy during mid-telling, whereas the effect of nods remained weak. The study offers further support to the notion of structural organization of storytelling, and suggests that the significance of vocal continuers as a vehicle of empathy may be greater than has been generally thought of.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:38, 15 January 2020

Voutilainen-etal2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Voutilainen-etal2019
Author(s) Liisa Voutilainen, Pentti Henttonen, Melisa Stevanovic, Mikko Kahri, Anssi Peräkylä
Title Nods, vocal continuers, and the perception of empathy in storytelling
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Stance, Storytelling, Empathy, Quantitative CA
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse Processes
Volume 56
Number 4
Pages 310–330
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1498670
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In her influential paper on stance, alignment, and affiliation in conversational storytelling, Tanya Stivers argued that two basic conversational means of receiving a story, nods and vocal continuers, differ in their function: whereas vocal continuers display alignment with the telling activity, nods, during the mid-telling, convey affiliation with the storytellers’ affective stance. In this paper, we elaborate these insights on the basis of a quantitative study informed by conversation analysis. Using a database of 317 stories told in Finnish, we analyzed how story recipients’ nods and continuers in different phases of storytelling (before and after the story climax) predict naïve raters’ judgments of the story recipients’ empathy toward the storyteller. We found that vocal continuers accounted for the perception of empathy during mid-telling, whereas the effect of nods remained weak. The study offers further support to the notion of structural organization of storytelling, and suggests that the significance of vocal continuers as a vehicle of empathy may be greater than has been generally thought of.

Notes