Difference between revisions of "Keevallik2018b"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; |Title=The temporal organization of conversation while mucking out a sheep stable |Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; J...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Lapses; Silence; Sequencing; Estonian; Response relevance | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Lapses; Silence; Sequencing; Estonian; Response relevance | ||
|Key=Keevallik2018b | |Key=Keevallik2018b | ||
| + | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and | + | |Address=Amsterdam |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Booktitle=Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources |
| + | |Pages=97–122 | ||
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.293.03kee | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.293.03kee | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1075/pbns.293.03kee |
|Abstract=Based on talk-oriented activities, there seems to be a consensus that turn-taking is organized to minimize gaps between turns. This study looks at a conversational sequence that evolved in a multi-party setting during a joint cleaning of a sheep stable, and analyzes how nextness is accomplished in an unproblematic manner after extensive silences. It argues that due to the non-cognitive but physically straining nature of the activity in a confined space, chatting is almost constant but response relevance is reduced. It discusses the moral orders of talk and work in this multiactivity setting, where urgency is not an issue, and suggests that data collection for sequence analysis be more attentive to the systematic differences between talk-oriented and other settings. | |Abstract=Based on talk-oriented activities, there seems to be a consensus that turn-taking is organized to minimize gaps between turns. This study looks at a conversational sequence that evolved in a multi-party setting during a joint cleaning of a sheep stable, and analyzes how nextness is accomplished in an unproblematic manner after extensive silences. It argues that due to the non-cognitive but physically straining nature of the activity in a confined space, chatting is almost constant but response relevance is reduced. It discusses the moral orders of talk and work in this multiactivity setting, where urgency is not an issue, and suggests that data collection for sequence analysis be more attentive to the systematic differences between talk-oriented and other settings. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:36, 13 January 2020
| Keevallik2018b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Keevallik2018b |
| Author(s) | Leelo Keevallik |
| Title | The temporal organization of conversation while mucking out a sheep stable |
| Editor(s) | Arnulf Deppermann, Jürgen Streeck |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Lapses, Silence, Sequencing, Estonian, Response relevance |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 97–122 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/pbns.293.03kee |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Based on talk-oriented activities, there seems to be a consensus that turn-taking is organized to minimize gaps between turns. This study looks at a conversational sequence that evolved in a multi-party setting during a joint cleaning of a sheep stable, and analyzes how nextness is accomplished in an unproblematic manner after extensive silences. It argues that due to the non-cognitive but physically straining nature of the activity in a confined space, chatting is almost constant but response relevance is reduced. It discusses the moral orders of talk and work in this multiactivity setting, where urgency is not an issue, and suggests that data collection for sequence analysis be more attentive to the systematic differences between talk-oriented and other settings.
Notes
