Difference between revisions of "Paananen-Majlesi2018"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jenny Paananen; Ali Reza Majlesi; |Title=Patient-centered interaction in interpreted primary care consultations |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversati...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=138 | |Volume=138 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=98–118 |
− | | | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216617307427 |
− | |Abstract=In this article, we analyze the interactional work of interpreters from the viewpoint of | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.003 |
− | patient-centered care. Interpreters can support patient-centered care by both translational | + | |Abstract=In this article, we analyze the interactional work of interpreters from the viewpoint of patient-centered care. Interpreters can support patient-centered care by both translational and non-translational actions. They can calibrate the talk in rendition so as to benefit the intersubjective understanding of all parties, and can also help doctors and patients understand each other better through various embodied means. Our analysis draws on a multimodal analysis of interaction (see e.g. Goodwin, 2018; Mondada, 2016) and is based on a detailed analysis of three primary care consultations video recorded at a Finnish health center. In each consultation, the patient is a refugee or an asylum seeker and the interpreter is a professional community interpreter. We demonstrate three practices that seem to enhance patient-centeredness. Firstly, we show how interpreters can balance between direct interpretation and mediation to produce a clear yet precise rendition of turns at talk. Secondly, we demonstrate how interpreters display recipiency and provide interactional space for the patient by producing response particles that encourage the patient to continue talking. Thirdly, we illustrate how embodied co-operation in interpreted consultations makes the renditions more intelligible and tangible for all the parties involved in interpreter-mediated interaction. |
− | and non-translational actions. They can calibrate the talk in rendition so as to | ||
− | intersubjective understanding of all parties, and can also help doctors and patients | ||
− | |||
− | multimodal analysis of interaction (see e.g. Goodwin, 2018; Mondada, 2016) and is based | ||
− | on a detailed analysis of three primary care consultations video recorded at a Finnish | ||
− | health center. In each consultation, the patient is a refugee or an asylum seeker and the | ||
− | interpreter is a professional community interpreter. We demonstrate three practices that | ||
− | seem to enhance patient-centeredness. Firstly, we show how interpreters can balance | ||
− | between direct interpretation and mediation to produce a clear yet precise rendition of | ||
− | turns at talk. Secondly, we demonstrate how interpreters display recipiency and provide | ||
− | interactional space for the patient by producing response particles that encourage the | ||
− | patient to continue talking. Thirdly, we illustrate how embodied co-operation in | ||
− | |||
− | involved in interpreter-mediated interaction. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 10:47, 12 January 2020
Paananen-Majlesi2018 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Paananen-Majlesi2018 |
Author(s) | Jenny Paananen, Ali Reza Majlesi |
Title | Patient-centered interaction in interpreted primary care consultations |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation analysis, Doctorepatient interaction, Gestures, Patient-centered care, Primary care consultation, Public service interpreting |
Publisher | |
Year | 2018 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 138 |
Number | |
Pages | 98–118 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.003 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In this article, we analyze the interactional work of interpreters from the viewpoint of patient-centered care. Interpreters can support patient-centered care by both translational and non-translational actions. They can calibrate the talk in rendition so as to benefit the intersubjective understanding of all parties, and can also help doctors and patients understand each other better through various embodied means. Our analysis draws on a multimodal analysis of interaction (see e.g. Goodwin, 2018; Mondada, 2016) and is based on a detailed analysis of three primary care consultations video recorded at a Finnish health center. In each consultation, the patient is a refugee or an asylum seeker and the interpreter is a professional community interpreter. We demonstrate three practices that seem to enhance patient-centeredness. Firstly, we show how interpreters can balance between direct interpretation and mediation to produce a clear yet precise rendition of turns at talk. Secondly, we demonstrate how interpreters display recipiency and provide interactional space for the patient by producing response particles that encourage the patient to continue talking. Thirdly, we illustrate how embodied co-operation in interpreted consultations makes the renditions more intelligible and tangible for all the parties involved in interpreter-mediated interaction.
Notes