Difference between revisions of "Stevanovic-Koski12018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Melisa Stevanovic; Sonja E. Koski; |Title=Intersubjectivity and the domains of social interaction: Proposal of a cross-sectional approac...")
 
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
 
|Pages=39–70
 
|Pages=39–70
|URL=https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2018-0003
+
|URL=https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/plc/22/1/article-p39.xml
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2018-0003
+
|DOI=10.2478/plc-2018-0003
 
|Abstract=Intersubjectivity is a concept central to human interaction, broadly understood as the sharing of minds. There is a rich diversity of conceptualizations of intersubjectivity, but detailed operationalization for its component processes in social interactions are scarce. We propose a novel approach to examine detailed variation in intersubjectivity in interaction. Our approach combines two previously formulated frameworks: the hierarchically organized developmental levels of intersubjectivity put forth in the field of developmental psychology, and three domains or orders of social interaction - affect, deontics, and epistemics - discussed in conversation analytic research literature. The interdisciplinary integration of these two frameworks allows a more crystallized view of intersubjectivity, which will benefit our understanding of the fine-scale social interaction processes as they vary in the course of the moment-to-moment unfolding of social action, across different stages of human social development, and between individuals belonging to different clinical groups and even to different species.
 
|Abstract=Intersubjectivity is a concept central to human interaction, broadly understood as the sharing of minds. There is a rich diversity of conceptualizations of intersubjectivity, but detailed operationalization for its component processes in social interactions are scarce. We propose a novel approach to examine detailed variation in intersubjectivity in interaction. Our approach combines two previously formulated frameworks: the hierarchically organized developmental levels of intersubjectivity put forth in the field of developmental psychology, and three domains or orders of social interaction - affect, deontics, and epistemics - discussed in conversation analytic research literature. The interdisciplinary integration of these two frameworks allows a more crystallized view of intersubjectivity, which will benefit our understanding of the fine-scale social interaction processes as they vary in the course of the moment-to-moment unfolding of social action, across different stages of human social development, and between individuals belonging to different clinical groups and even to different species.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 00:48, 12 January 2020

Stevanovic-Koski12018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Stevanovic-Koski12018
Author(s) Melisa Stevanovic, Sonja E. Koski
Title Intersubjectivity and the domains of social interaction: Proposal of a cross-sectional approach
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, social interaction, affectivity, intersubjectivity, deontics, epistemics
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Psychology of Language and Communication
Volume 22
Number 1
Pages 39–70
URL Link
DOI 10.2478/plc-2018-0003
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Intersubjectivity is a concept central to human interaction, broadly understood as the sharing of minds. There is a rich diversity of conceptualizations of intersubjectivity, but detailed operationalization for its component processes in social interactions are scarce. We propose a novel approach to examine detailed variation in intersubjectivity in interaction. Our approach combines two previously formulated frameworks: the hierarchically organized developmental levels of intersubjectivity put forth in the field of developmental psychology, and three domains or orders of social interaction - affect, deontics, and epistemics - discussed in conversation analytic research literature. The interdisciplinary integration of these two frameworks allows a more crystallized view of intersubjectivity, which will benefit our understanding of the fine-scale social interaction processes as they vary in the course of the moment-to-moment unfolding of social action, across different stages of human social development, and between individuals belonging to different clinical groups and even to different species.

Notes