Difference between revisions of "Thompson-McCabe2018"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Laura Thompson; Rose McCabe; |Title=How Psychiatrists Recommend Treatment and Its Relationship with Patient Uptake |Tag(s)=EMCA; Psychia...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Laura Thompson; Rose McCabe; | |Author(s)=Laura Thompson; Rose McCabe; | ||
| − | |Title=How | + | |Title=How psychiatrists recommend treatment and its relationship with patient uptake |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Psychiatraic consultations; Treatment Recommendation | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Psychiatraic consultations; Treatment Recommendation | ||
|Key=Thompson-McCabe2018 | |Key=Thompson-McCabe2018 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=33 | |Volume=33 | ||
|Number=11 | |Number=11 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=1345–1354 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10410236.2017.1350916 |
|DOI=10.1080/10410236.2017.1350916 | |DOI=10.1080/10410236.2017.1350916 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Consultations for patients with chronic mental health conditions are conceived as meetings of experts: medical and experiential, respectively. Treatment decisions, in these terms, become a joint responsibility rather than handed down ex-cathedra. One resource for constituting decisions as ‘shared’ is the treatment recommendation – decisional authority can be invoked through its design. There is concern that people diagnosed with schizophrenia are infrequently involved in treatment decisions. However, the methods psychiatrists actually employ remain undefined. This article advances our understanding of | + | |Abstract=Consultations for patients with chronic mental health conditions are conceived as meetings of experts: medical and experiential, respectively. Treatment decisions, in these terms, become a joint responsibility rather than handed down ex-cathedra. One resource for constituting decisions as ‘shared’ is the treatment recommendation – decisional authority can be invoked through its design. There is concern that people diagnosed with schizophrenia are infrequently involved in treatment decisions. However, the methods psychiatrists actually employ remain undefined. This article advances our understanding of psychiatric practice by mapping alternative methods used by psychiatrists to recommend treatment in outpatient consultations in situ. First, we unpack the types of treatments psychiatrists recommend. Then, we ask how psychiatrists recommend treatment? Applying a novel coding taxonomy, informed by the conversation analytic principle that recommendations represent different social actions, we identify the distribution of alternative formulations for psychiatrists’ recommendations (pronouncements, suggestions, proposals, and offers). We also propose one linguistic dimension, personal pronouns, on which recommending actions often depend, implicative for who is projected as ‘accountable’ for the decision. Finally, we examine the relationship between action type and patient uptake: is a particular type of recommendation more likely to attract acceptance/resistance from patients? And how does this relate to decisional accountability? |
| − | psychiatric practice by mapping alternative methods used by psychiatrists to recommend treatment in outpatient consultations in situ. First, we unpack the types of treatments psychiatrists recommend. Then, we ask how psychiatrists recommend treatment? Applying a novel coding taxonomy, informed by the conversation analytic principle that recommendations represent different social actions, we identify the distribution of alternative formulations for psychiatrists’ recommendations (pronouncements, suggestions, proposals, and offers). We also propose one linguistic dimension, personal pronouns, on which recommending actions often depend, implicative for who is projected as ‘accountable’ for the decision. Finally, we examine the relationship between action type and patient uptake: is a particular type of recommendation more likely to attract acceptance/resistance from patients? And how does this relate to decisional accountability? | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:29, 11 January 2020
| Thompson-McCabe2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Thompson-McCabe2018 |
| Author(s) | Laura Thompson, Rose McCabe |
| Title | How psychiatrists recommend treatment and its relationship with patient uptake |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Psychiatraic consultations, Treatment Recommendation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Health Communication |
| Volume | 33 |
| Number | 11 |
| Pages | 1345–1354 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/10410236.2017.1350916 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Consultations for patients with chronic mental health conditions are conceived as meetings of experts: medical and experiential, respectively. Treatment decisions, in these terms, become a joint responsibility rather than handed down ex-cathedra. One resource for constituting decisions as ‘shared’ is the treatment recommendation – decisional authority can be invoked through its design. There is concern that people diagnosed with schizophrenia are infrequently involved in treatment decisions. However, the methods psychiatrists actually employ remain undefined. This article advances our understanding of psychiatric practice by mapping alternative methods used by psychiatrists to recommend treatment in outpatient consultations in situ. First, we unpack the types of treatments psychiatrists recommend. Then, we ask how psychiatrists recommend treatment? Applying a novel coding taxonomy, informed by the conversation analytic principle that recommendations represent different social actions, we identify the distribution of alternative formulations for psychiatrists’ recommendations (pronouncements, suggestions, proposals, and offers). We also propose one linguistic dimension, personal pronouns, on which recommending actions often depend, implicative for who is projected as ‘accountable’ for the decision. Finally, we examine the relationship between action type and patient uptake: is a particular type of recommendation more likely to attract acceptance/resistance from patients? And how does this relate to decisional accountability?
Notes
