Difference between revisions of "Ticca-Traverso2018"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Anna Claudia Ticca; Veronique Traverso |Title=When questioners count on recipients' lack of knowledge |Editor(s)=Maj-Britt Mosegaa...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Anna Claudia Ticca; Veronique Traverso | |Author(s)=Anna Claudia Ticca; Veronique Traverso | ||
| − | |Title=When questioners count on recipients' lack of knowledge | + | |Title=When questioners count on recipients' lack of knowledge |
|Editor(s)=Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen; Rosina Márquez Reiter | |Editor(s)=Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen; Rosina Márquez Reiter | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Questions and answers; French; Italian; Epistemics; Knowledge; Institutional interaction; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Questions and answers; French; Italian; Epistemics; Knowledge; Institutional interaction; |
|Key=Ticca-Traverso2018 | |Key=Ticca-Traverso2018 | ||
| + | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| + | |Address=Amsterdam | ||
|Booktitle=The Pragmatics of Sensitive Activities in Institutional Discourse | |Booktitle=The Pragmatics of Sensitive Activities in Institutional Discourse | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=115–133 |
|URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027263681-bct.96.05tic | |URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027263681-bct.96.05tic | ||
|Abstract=This paper studies a type of question-answer sequences which accomplish what can be considered as a delicate activity due to its projected sequential development. In contrast with other formats of question-answer sequences with different functions (i.e. eliciting information, checking the questionee’s knowledge, etc.), here the studied format seems to count on the questionee’s lack of knowledge, consequently projecting the questioner’s own answer. This hypothesis is examined through a detailed analysis of video-recorded guided tours in French and Italian. The paper describes the different sequence trajectories occurring after the guide’s question, and the difficulties both participants may find in dealing with the procedure. | |Abstract=This paper studies a type of question-answer sequences which accomplish what can be considered as a delicate activity due to its projected sequential development. In contrast with other formats of question-answer sequences with different functions (i.e. eliciting information, checking the questionee’s knowledge, etc.), here the studied format seems to count on the questionee’s lack of knowledge, consequently projecting the questioner’s own answer. This hypothesis is examined through a detailed analysis of video-recorded guided tours in French and Italian. The paper describes the different sequence trajectories occurring after the guide’s question, and the difficulties both participants may find in dealing with the procedure. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:29, 11 January 2020
| Ticca-Traverso2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Ticca-Traverso2018 |
| Author(s) | Anna Claudia Ticca, Veronique Traverso |
| Title | When questioners count on recipients' lack of knowledge |
| Editor(s) | Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen, Rosina Márquez Reiter |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Questions and answers, French, Italian, Epistemics, Knowledge, Institutional interaction |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 115–133 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | The Pragmatics of Sensitive Activities in Institutional Discourse |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper studies a type of question-answer sequences which accomplish what can be considered as a delicate activity due to its projected sequential development. In contrast with other formats of question-answer sequences with different functions (i.e. eliciting information, checking the questionee’s knowledge, etc.), here the studied format seems to count on the questionee’s lack of knowledge, consequently projecting the questioner’s own answer. This hypothesis is examined through a detailed analysis of video-recorded guided tours in French and Italian. The paper describes the different sequence trajectories occurring after the guide’s question, and the difficulties both participants may find in dealing with the procedure.
Notes
