Difference between revisions of "Tuncer2018"
m (doi) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Face-to-face interactions; Multimodal analysis; Joining in an interaction; F-formation; Participation inclusion and exclusion at work | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Face-to-face interactions; Multimodal analysis; Joining in an interaction; F-formation; Participation inclusion and exclusion at work | ||
|Key=Tuncer2018 | |Key=Tuncer2018 | ||
| − | |||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=132 | |Volume=132 | ||
|Pages=76–90 | |Pages=76–90 | ||
| − | |URL=https:// | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037821661730423X |
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.013 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.013 | ||
|Abstract=This article studies how co-present workers can join in a co-present interaction they were not previously involved in, thus challenging initial participants' interactional preserve. It is based on ethnographically-informed analyses of video-recorded interactions in workplaces, in English as a lingua franca and in French. Potential joiners' recurrent embodied and verbal practices are identified and analyzed, showing regular methods associated with potential joiners' position relative to the F-formation, and different layouts typical of workplaces. Another set of findings bears on how potential joiners shape their move so as to account for joining in at that moment, to project a more or less extended participation, and to implement a collaborative project. Beyond the variety of projects the practice can serve, potential joiners' moves are systematically designed so as to demonstrate their contribution to the progression of work. | |Abstract=This article studies how co-present workers can join in a co-present interaction they were not previously involved in, thus challenging initial participants' interactional preserve. It is based on ethnographically-informed analyses of video-recorded interactions in workplaces, in English as a lingua franca and in French. Potential joiners' recurrent embodied and verbal practices are identified and analyzed, showing regular methods associated with potential joiners' position relative to the F-formation, and different layouts typical of workplaces. Another set of findings bears on how potential joiners shape their move so as to account for joining in at that moment, to project a more or less extended participation, and to implement a collaborative project. Beyond the variety of projects the practice can serve, potential joiners' moves are systematically designed so as to demonstrate their contribution to the progression of work. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:04, 11 January 2020
| Tuncer2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Tuncer2018 |
| Author(s) | Sylvaine Tuncer |
| Title | Non-participants joining in an interaction in shared work spaces: Multimodal practices to enter the floor and account for it |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Face-to-face interactions, Multimodal analysis, Joining in an interaction, F-formation, Participation inclusion and exclusion at work |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 132 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 76–90 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.013 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article studies how co-present workers can join in a co-present interaction they were not previously involved in, thus challenging initial participants' interactional preserve. It is based on ethnographically-informed analyses of video-recorded interactions in workplaces, in English as a lingua franca and in French. Potential joiners' recurrent embodied and verbal practices are identified and analyzed, showing regular methods associated with potential joiners' position relative to the F-formation, and different layouts typical of workplaces. Another set of findings bears on how potential joiners shape their move so as to account for joining in at that moment, to project a more or less extended participation, and to implement a collaborative project. Beyond the variety of projects the practice can serve, potential joiners' moves are systematically designed so as to demonstrate their contribution to the progression of work.
Notes
