Difference between revisions of "Herlin-Visapaa2016"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ilona Herlin; Laura Visapää |Title=Dimensions of empathy in relation to language |Tag(s)=EMCA; Empathy; Intersubjectivity; |Key=Herli...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Ilona Herlin; Laura Visapää | |Author(s)=Ilona Herlin; Laura Visapää | ||
|Title=Dimensions of empathy in relation to language | |Title=Dimensions of empathy in relation to language | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Empathy; Intersubjectivity; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Empathy; Intersubjectivity; |
|Key=Herlin-Visapaa2016 | |Key=Herlin-Visapaa2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Nordic Journal of Linguistics | |Journal=Nordic Journal of Linguistics | ||
|Volume=39 | |Volume=39 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=145–157 |
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nordic-journal-of-linguistics/article/dimensions-of-empathy-in-relation-to-language/B0E4BA5322618FF44B6CDE96D4B55295 | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nordic-journal-of-linguistics/article/dimensions-of-empathy-in-relation-to-language/B0E4BA5322618FF44B6CDE96D4B55295 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1017/S0332586516000111 |
|Abstract=This article approaches the relationship between empathy and language, describing the ways in which different dimensions of empathy can be attested in naturally occurring interactional data. The authors adopt the definition of empathy as a multidimensional phenomenon: emotional contagion, as well as the cognitive and affective dimensions of empathy, are all understood to be central to the empathetic process. The article promotes the view that studying the relationship between empathy and language should be grounded in the analysis of real-life interactions. Language evolves in social interaction both phylogenetically and ontogenetically, and is not only an important product but also a means of human sociality. The authors suggest that the best approach for analyzing the empathy–language interface combines the theoretical insights of cognitive grammar with the method of conversation analysis. The paper shows that when empathy is analyzed in natural conversation, we can do sequential and linguistic analysis of the ways in which affect is shown, and through a careful analysis of grammatical devices, offer an explanation of whether the displays of affect are derived from the other person's situation. By analyzing the complex ways in which the interactants orient to the different dimensions of empathy, the paper shows how linguistic analysis can give us concrete tools for forming a deeper understanding of how empathy takes place in real-life encounters. | |Abstract=This article approaches the relationship between empathy and language, describing the ways in which different dimensions of empathy can be attested in naturally occurring interactional data. The authors adopt the definition of empathy as a multidimensional phenomenon: emotional contagion, as well as the cognitive and affective dimensions of empathy, are all understood to be central to the empathetic process. The article promotes the view that studying the relationship between empathy and language should be grounded in the analysis of real-life interactions. Language evolves in social interaction both phylogenetically and ontogenetically, and is not only an important product but also a means of human sociality. The authors suggest that the best approach for analyzing the empathy–language interface combines the theoretical insights of cognitive grammar with the method of conversation analysis. The paper shows that when empathy is analyzed in natural conversation, we can do sequential and linguistic analysis of the ways in which affect is shown, and through a careful analysis of grammatical devices, offer an explanation of whether the displays of affect are derived from the other person's situation. By analyzing the complex ways in which the interactants orient to the different dimensions of empathy, the paper shows how linguistic analysis can give us concrete tools for forming a deeper understanding of how empathy takes place in real-life encounters. | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:20, 27 December 2019
| Herlin-Visapaa2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Herlin-Visapaa2016 |
| Author(s) | Ilona Herlin, Laura Visapää |
| Title | Dimensions of empathy in relation to language |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Empathy, Intersubjectivity |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Nordic Journal of Linguistics |
| Volume | 39 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 145–157 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0332586516000111 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article approaches the relationship between empathy and language, describing the ways in which different dimensions of empathy can be attested in naturally occurring interactional data. The authors adopt the definition of empathy as a multidimensional phenomenon: emotional contagion, as well as the cognitive and affective dimensions of empathy, are all understood to be central to the empathetic process. The article promotes the view that studying the relationship between empathy and language should be grounded in the analysis of real-life interactions. Language evolves in social interaction both phylogenetically and ontogenetically, and is not only an important product but also a means of human sociality. The authors suggest that the best approach for analyzing the empathy–language interface combines the theoretical insights of cognitive grammar with the method of conversation analysis. The paper shows that when empathy is analyzed in natural conversation, we can do sequential and linguistic analysis of the ways in which affect is shown, and through a careful analysis of grammatical devices, offer an explanation of whether the displays of affect are derived from the other person's situation. By analyzing the complex ways in which the interactants orient to the different dimensions of empathy, the paper shows how linguistic analysis can give us concrete tools for forming a deeper understanding of how empathy takes place in real-life encounters.
Notes
