Difference between revisions of "Chevalier2015"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Fabienne H.G. Chevalier |Title=Withholding explicit assessments in tourist-office talk |Editor(s)=Fabienne H.G. Chevalier, John Moo...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Fabienne H.G. Chevalier | + | |Author(s)=Fabienne H. G. Chevalier |
|Title=Withholding explicit assessments in tourist-office talk | |Title=Withholding explicit assessments in tourist-office talk | ||
| − | |Editor(s)=Fabienne H.G. Chevalier | + | |Editor(s)=Fabienne H. G. Chevalier; John Moore; |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Assessments; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Assessments; |
|Key=Chevalier2015 | |Key=Chevalier2015 | ||
|Publisher=John Benjamins | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Chapter=4 | |Chapter=4 | ||
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: | + | |Booktitle=Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=115–149 |
| + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.255.04che | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1075/pbns.255.04che | ||
| + | |Abstract=This chapter examines the withholding of explicit assessments by tourist officers in response to enquiries that make such assessments relevant in tourist-office talk. Although there is no formal policy in place banning the production of assessments, tourist officers construct making explicit assessments in this sequential environment as a restricted activity. Drawing upon a large corpus of telephone calls in French, analysis shows that explicit personal assessments are withheld in favour of references to institutionalised value systems and recognisable normalised categories and descriptors such as star ranking, price range. These references provide clues for the callers to interpret and enable tourist officers to accomplish implicit evaluative work, whilst avoiding being heard as having made overt recommendations. Through such a practice, tourist officers manage issues of professional accountability and responsibility, constitute their professional identity as intermediaries between the public and the local business community and construct the principle of impartiality that characterises the tourist office. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:33, 16 December 2019
| Chevalier2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Chevalier2015 |
| Author(s) | Fabienne H. G. Chevalier |
| Title | Withholding explicit assessments in tourist-office talk |
| Editor(s) | Fabienne H. G. Chevalier, John Moore |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Assessments |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 115–149 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/pbns.255.04che |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction |
| Chapter | 4 |
Abstract
This chapter examines the withholding of explicit assessments by tourist officers in response to enquiries that make such assessments relevant in tourist-office talk. Although there is no formal policy in place banning the production of assessments, tourist officers construct making explicit assessments in this sequential environment as a restricted activity. Drawing upon a large corpus of telephone calls in French, analysis shows that explicit personal assessments are withheld in favour of references to institutionalised value systems and recognisable normalised categories and descriptors such as star ranking, price range. These references provide clues for the callers to interpret and enable tourist officers to accomplish implicit evaluative work, whilst avoiding being heard as having made overt recommendations. Through such a practice, tourist officers manage issues of professional accountability and responsibility, constitute their professional identity as intermediaries between the public and the local business community and construct the principle of impartiality that characterises the tourist office.
Notes
