Difference between revisions of "Heritage2015a"
(BibTeX auto import 2015-10-29 11:41:25) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=John Heritage; |
|Title=Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective | |Title=Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis; discourse particles; turn-initial position; well | |Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis; discourse particles; turn-initial position; well | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Heritage2015a |
| − | |||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=88 | |Volume=88 | ||
|Pages=88–104 | |Pages=88–104 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216615002465 |
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008 | ||
|Abstract=This paper presents evidence that the discourse particle well functions as a generalized procedural alert that the turn it prefaces will privilege its speaker's perspectives, interests or project relative to the expectations for action established in the prior turn or sequence. Using data from a corpus of 748 well-prefaced turns, a range of contexts that enrich and specify this function are identified including (i) responses to questions, (ii) topic shift and topic closure, and (iii)'my side' corroborations of descriptions and judgments. | |Abstract=This paper presents evidence that the discourse particle well functions as a generalized procedural alert that the turn it prefaces will privilege its speaker's perspectives, interests or project relative to the expectations for action established in the prior turn or sequence. Using data from a corpus of 748 well-prefaced turns, a range of contexts that enrich and specify this function are identified including (i) responses to questions, (ii) topic shift and topic closure, and (iii)'my side' corroborations of descriptions and judgments. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:15, 15 December 2019
| Heritage2015a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Heritage2015a |
| Author(s) | John Heritage |
| Title | Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis, discourse particles, turn-initial position, well |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 88 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 88–104 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper presents evidence that the discourse particle well functions as a generalized procedural alert that the turn it prefaces will privilege its speaker's perspectives, interests or project relative to the expectations for action established in the prior turn or sequence. Using data from a corpus of 748 well-prefaced turns, a range of contexts that enrich and specify this function are identified including (i) responses to questions, (ii) topic shift and topic closure, and (iii)'my side' corroborations of descriptions and judgments.
Notes
