Difference between revisions of "Imo2015"
(BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:43) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
− | | | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
− | | | + | |Author(s)=Wolfgang Imo; |
|Title=Temporality and syntactic structure utterance-final intensifiers in spoken German | |Title=Temporality and syntactic structure utterance-final intensifiers in spoken German | ||
− | | | + | |Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner; |
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics | |Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics | ||
− | | | + | |Key=Imo2015 |
+ | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
+ | |Year=2015 | ||
+ | |Language=English | ||
+ | |Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia | ||
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction | |Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|Pages=147–172 | |Pages=147–172 | ||
+ | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.27.05imo | ||
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.05imo | |DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.05imo | ||
|Abstract=In German syntax, the so-called right verb brace, which is occupied either by the non-finite parts of the verb or a predicative, signals a strong syntactic boundary of a clause after which – at least from a normative perspective – only few further elements are allowed to occur. Nevertheless, in spoken German one can find many instances where words or phrases are uttered after the right verb brace which – canonically speaking – should have been placed before it. This article analyzes one class of such ‘misplaced’ items, namely post-positioned intensifiers, from a temporal and interactional perspective on language. | |Abstract=In German syntax, the so-called right verb brace, which is occupied either by the non-finite parts of the verb or a predicative, signals a strong syntactic boundary of a clause after which – at least from a normative perspective – only few further elements are allowed to occur. Nevertheless, in spoken German one can find many instances where words or phrases are uttered after the right verb brace which – canonically speaking – should have been placed before it. This article analyzes one class of such ‘misplaced’ items, namely post-positioned intensifiers, from a temporal and interactional perspective on language. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 10:00, 15 December 2019
Imo2015 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Imo2015 |
Author(s) | Wolfgang Imo |
Title | Temporality and syntactic structure utterance-final intensifiers in spoken German |
Editor(s) | Arnulf Deppermann, Susanne Günthner |
Tag(s) | Interactional Linguistics |
Publisher | John Benjamins |
Year | 2015 |
Language | English |
City | Amsterdam/Philadelphia |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 147–172 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1075/slsi.27.05imo |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Temporality in Interaction |
Chapter |
Abstract
In German syntax, the so-called right verb brace, which is occupied either by the non-finite parts of the verb or a predicative, signals a strong syntactic boundary of a clause after which – at least from a normative perspective – only few further elements are allowed to occur. Nevertheless, in spoken German one can find many instances where words or phrases are uttered after the right verb brace which – canonically speaking – should have been placed before it. This article analyzes one class of such ‘misplaced’ items, namely post-positioned intensifiers, from a temporal and interactional perspective on language.
Notes