Difference between revisions of "Niemi2015"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Kreeta Niemi; Amanda Bateman | |Author(s)=Kreeta Niemi; Amanda Bateman | ||
| − | |Title='Cheaters and | + | |Title='Cheaters and stalkers': accusations in a classroom |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; MCA; Classroom; Accountability; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; MCA; Classroom; Accountability; |
|Key=Niemi2015 | |Key=Niemi2015 | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=17 | |Volume=17 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=83–98 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445614557755 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445614557755 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445614557755 | ||
|Abstract=This article explores accusations as collaboratively accomplished in classroom peer interactions in the absence of a teacher. The analysis shows how the children use local classroom rules and teacher authority as resources and warrants to invoke multi-layered moral orders and identities, and hold one child accountable through accusations about their behavior. The accused children are categorized in a duplicative way with morally degrading descriptions and as out-group members. This article argues that understanding children’s accusations requires understanding of how such interactions compose and reflect the school context that is co-produced through the implementation of accountable ways in which to behave. | |Abstract=This article explores accusations as collaboratively accomplished in classroom peer interactions in the absence of a teacher. The analysis shows how the children use local classroom rules and teacher authority as resources and warrants to invoke multi-layered moral orders and identities, and hold one child accountable through accusations about their behavior. The accused children are categorized in a duplicative way with morally degrading descriptions and as out-group members. This article argues that understanding children’s accusations requires understanding of how such interactions compose and reflect the school context that is co-produced through the implementation of accountable ways in which to behave. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:41, 15 December 2019
| Niemi2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Niemi2015 |
| Author(s) | Kreeta Niemi, Amanda Bateman |
| Title | 'Cheaters and stalkers': accusations in a classroom |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, MCA, Classroom, Accountability |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 17 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 83–98 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445614557755 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article explores accusations as collaboratively accomplished in classroom peer interactions in the absence of a teacher. The analysis shows how the children use local classroom rules and teacher authority as resources and warrants to invoke multi-layered moral orders and identities, and hold one child accountable through accusations about their behavior. The accused children are categorized in a duplicative way with morally degrading descriptions and as out-group members. This article argues that understanding children’s accusations requires understanding of how such interactions compose and reflect the school context that is co-produced through the implementation of accountable ways in which to behave.
Notes
