Difference between revisions of "Oittinen-Piirainen-Marsh2015"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis" to "Conversation Analysis") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Oittinen-Piirainen-Marsh2015 | |Key=Oittinen-Piirainen-Marsh2015 | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| − | |Journal=Journal of | + | |Language=English |
| + | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=85 | |Volume=85 | ||
|Pages=47–66 | |Pages=47–66 | ||
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216615001782 | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216615001782 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001 | ||
| − | |Abstract=The prerequisites for opening a meeting, or beginning any kind of interaction for that matter, are participants’ presence and shared orientation towards the situation at hand. This paper analyses how the initial moments of technology-mediated business meetings involving distributed work groups are organized sequentially and multimodally. Drawing on video-recorded meetings in an | + | |Abstract=The prerequisites for opening a meeting, or beginning any kind of interaction for that matter, are participants’ presence and shared orientation towards the situation at hand. This paper analyses how the initial moments of technology-mediated business meetings involving distributed work groups are organized sequentially and multimodally. Drawing on video-recorded meetings in an international company, it documents the multimodal practices used in the process of establishing co-orientation to the shared meeting space and achieving entry into the meeting. The analysis shows that the stepwise unfolding of the opening phase requires the coordination of verbal and bodily conducts as well as the affordances of the technological artefacts utilized. The study contributes to a growing body of research investigating the emergent, collective and multimodal accomplishment of activities in workplace meetings. |
| − | company, it documents the multimodal practices used in the process of establishing co-orientation to the shared meeting space and achieving entry into the meeting. The analysis shows that the stepwise unfolding of the opening phase requires the coordination of verbal and bodily conducts as well as the affordances of the technological artefacts utilized. The study contributes to a growing body of research investigating the emergent, collective and multimodal accomplishment of activities in workplace meetings. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:31, 15 December 2019
| Oittinen-Piirainen-Marsh2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Oittinen-Piirainen-Marsh2015 |
| Author(s) | Tuire Oittinen, Arja Piirainen-Marsh |
| Title | Openings in technology-mediated business meetings |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Workplace meetings, Technology-mediated interaction, Conversation Analysis, Multimodal practices |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 85 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 47–66 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The prerequisites for opening a meeting, or beginning any kind of interaction for that matter, are participants’ presence and shared orientation towards the situation at hand. This paper analyses how the initial moments of technology-mediated business meetings involving distributed work groups are organized sequentially and multimodally. Drawing on video-recorded meetings in an international company, it documents the multimodal practices used in the process of establishing co-orientation to the shared meeting space and achieving entry into the meeting. The analysis shows that the stepwise unfolding of the opening phase requires the coordination of verbal and bodily conducts as well as the affordances of the technological artefacts utilized. The study contributes to a growing body of research investigating the emergent, collective and multimodal accomplishment of activities in workplace meetings.
Notes
