Difference between revisions of "Gubrium-Holstein2012"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jaber F. Gubrium; James A. Holstein; |Title=“Don’t Argue with the Members” |Tag(s)=EMCA; Melvin Pollner; Mundane reason; Membermea...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Jaber F. Gubrium; James A. Holstein;
 
|Author(s)=Jaber F. Gubrium; James A. Holstein;
|Title=“Don’t Argue with the Members”
+
|Title=“Don’t argue with the members”
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Melvin Pollner; Mundane reason; Membermeanings; Meaning-making; Meaning substitution; Conditional meaning; Social construction;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Melvin Pollner; Mundane reason; Membermeanings; Meaning-making; Meaning substitution; Conditional meaning; Social construction;
 
|Key=Gubrium-Holstein2012
 
|Key=Gubrium-Holstein2012
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|Journal=The American Sociologist
 
|Journal=The American Sociologist
 
|Volume=43
 
|Volume=43
 +
|Number=1
 
|Pages=85–98
 
|Pages=85–98
 +
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12108-011-9145-y
 
|DOI=10.1007/s12108-011-9145-y
 
|DOI=10.1007/s12108-011-9145-y
|Abstract=Mel Pollner regularly cautioned researchers not to argue with the members
+
|Abstract=Mel Pollner regularly cautioned researchers not to argue with the members of settings under consideration. He warned against substituting the researcher’s meaning for the meanings of those being studied. This article discusses facets of the caution as they relate to the research process. Seemingly simple, the tenet is nuanced in application. The article adds to the nuance by distinguishing what is called the “replacement” of meaning with the “displacement” of meaning, providing a way of understanding what members could mean if the contexts and settings of their accounts were taken into consideration.
of settings under consideration. He warned against substituting the researcher’s
 
meaning for the meanings of those being studied. This article discusses facets of the
 
caution as they relate to the research process. Seemingly simple, the tenet is nuanced
 
in application. The article adds to the nuance by distinguishing what is called the
 
“replacement” of meaning with the “displacement” of meaning, providing a way of
 
understanding what members could mean if the contexts and settings of their
 
accounts were taken into consideration.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:50, 30 November 2019

Gubrium-Holstein2012
BibType ARTICLE
Key Gubrium-Holstein2012
Author(s) Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein
Title “Don’t argue with the members”
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Melvin Pollner, Mundane reason, Membermeanings, Meaning-making, Meaning substitution, Conditional meaning, Social construction
Publisher
Year 2012
Language
City
Month
Journal The American Sociologist
Volume 43
Number 1
Pages 85–98
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s12108-011-9145-y
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Mel Pollner regularly cautioned researchers not to argue with the members of settings under consideration. He warned against substituting the researcher’s meaning for the meanings of those being studied. This article discusses facets of the caution as they relate to the research process. Seemingly simple, the tenet is nuanced in application. The article adds to the nuance by distinguishing what is called the “replacement” of meaning with the “displacement” of meaning, providing a way of understanding what members could mean if the contexts and settings of their accounts were taken into consideration.

Notes