Difference between revisions of "Barth-Weingarten2011a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Barth-Weingarten2011a | |Key=Barth-Weingarten2011a | ||
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 | ||
− | |Journal=Gesprächsforschung | + | |Journal=Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion |
|Volume=12 | |Volume=12 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=301–370 |
− | |URL=www.gespraechsforschung- | + | |URL=http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2011/ga-barth-weingarten.pdf |
− | |Abstract=This paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge on current listeners' | + | |Abstract=This paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge on current listeners' responses in talk-in-interaction. In particular, it complements earlier findings on double sayings of German JA by describing some additional prosodic-phonetic parameters and a visual feature of its realization in institutional and semi-private interaction (doctor-patient interaction, Big Brother, TV talk shows). These include pitch contour, pitch range and phonetic ending, on the one hand, and nodding on the other. |
− | + | ||
− | double sayings of German JA by describing some additional prosodic-phonetic | + | The paper shows that JAJA is a truly multimodal phenomenon, with the individual features accomplishing interactional functions across sequence-organizational habitats, including (re)claiming epistemic priority in an aside, making continuation relevant, agreeing/ acknowledging with reservation and aligning with the continuation of a sequence. Lack of nodding is suggested to have situational as well as misalignment reasons. |
− | parameters and a visual feature of its realization in institutional and semi-private | + | |
− | interaction (doctor-patient interaction, Big Brother, TV talk shows). These include | + | On the basis of its observations, the paper also raises the question whether it is the applicability of response token variants across action and sequence types which makes them memorizable despite their variability. |
− | pitch contour, pitch range and phonetic ending, on the one hand, and nodding on | ||
− | the other. | ||
− | The paper shows that JAJA is a truly multimodal phenomenon, with the | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | continuation of a sequence. Lack of nodding is suggested to have situational as | ||
− | well as misalignment reasons. | ||
− | On the basis of its observations, the paper also raises the question whether it is | ||
− | the applicability of response token variants across action and sequence types | ||
− | which makes them memorizable despite their variability. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 01:18, 29 November 2019
Barth-Weingarten2011a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Barth-Weingarten2011a |
Author(s) | Dagmar Barth-Weingarten |
Title | Response tokens in interaction-prosody, phonetics and a visual aspect of German JAJA (with 36 Audio- and 18 Videoclips) |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | IL, response tokens, continuers, epistemic priority, pitch, phonetic ending, duration, nodding, alignment, affiliation, German |
Publisher | |
Year | 2011 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion |
Volume | 12 |
Number | |
Pages | 301–370 |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge on current listeners' responses in talk-in-interaction. In particular, it complements earlier findings on double sayings of German JA by describing some additional prosodic-phonetic parameters and a visual feature of its realization in institutional and semi-private interaction (doctor-patient interaction, Big Brother, TV talk shows). These include pitch contour, pitch range and phonetic ending, on the one hand, and nodding on the other.
The paper shows that JAJA is a truly multimodal phenomenon, with the individual features accomplishing interactional functions across sequence-organizational habitats, including (re)claiming epistemic priority in an aside, making continuation relevant, agreeing/ acknowledging with reservation and aligning with the continuation of a sequence. Lack of nodding is suggested to have situational as well as misalignment reasons.
On the basis of its observations, the paper also raises the question whether it is the applicability of response token variants across action and sequence types which makes them memorizable despite their variability.
Notes