Difference between revisions of "Heritage2011e"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Heritage; |Title=The interaction order and clinical practice: Some observations on dysfunctions and action steps |Tag(s)=EMCA; Con...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=John Heritage; | + | |Author(s)=John Heritage; |
|Title=The interaction order and clinical practice: Some observations on dysfunctions and action steps | |Title=The interaction order and clinical practice: Some observations on dysfunctions and action steps | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Medical EMCA; Problem Presentation; Medical Questioning; Patient Resistance | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Medical EMCA; Problem Presentation; Medical Questioning; Patient Resistance | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Patient Education and Counseling | |Journal=Patient Education and Counseling | ||
|Volume=84 | |Volume=84 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=338–343 |
| − | |DOI= | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0738399111002485 |
| − | |Abstract= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.022 |
| − | Objective | + | |Abstract=Objective |
This paper examines three dysfunctional communication processes in the primary care consultation using conversation analysis theory and methods: dysfunctions in problem presentation, medical questioning that limits the expression of additional concerns, and the emergence of discordance between physicians and patients in the context of treatment recommendations. | This paper examines three dysfunctional communication processes in the primary care consultation using conversation analysis theory and methods: dysfunctions in problem presentation, medical questioning that limits the expression of additional concerns, and the emergence of discordance between physicians and patients in the context of treatment recommendations. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Practice implications | Practice implications | ||
Reduction of these dysfunctions is most likely to emerge when physicians recognize the nature of these dysfunctional practices and their roots in everyday social life. Recognition of these practices together with their functions and dysfunctions may hold a solid prospect for improvements in medical communication. | Reduction of these dysfunctions is most likely to emerge when physicians recognize the nature of these dysfunctional practices and their roots in everyday social life. Recognition of these practices together with their functions and dysfunctions may hold a solid prospect for improvements in medical communication. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:26, 29 November 2019
| Heritage2011e | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Heritage2011e |
| Author(s) | John Heritage |
| Title | The interaction order and clinical practice: Some observations on dysfunctions and action steps |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Medical EMCA, Problem Presentation, Medical Questioning, Patient Resistance |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Patient Education and Counseling |
| Volume | 84 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 338–343 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.022 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Objective This paper examines three dysfunctional communication processes in the primary care consultation using conversation analysis theory and methods: dysfunctions in problem presentation, medical questioning that limits the expression of additional concerns, and the emergence of discordance between physicians and patients in the context of treatment recommendations.
Results It is proposed that these dysfunctions arise from the transfer of normative conventions that function well in the practice of ordinary conversation into medical contexts where they serve to limit the effectiveness of communication. Because these conventions are rooted in, and reinforced by, the activities of daily life, they may be difficult to eradicate from the medical visit.
Practice implications Reduction of these dysfunctions is most likely to emerge when physicians recognize the nature of these dysfunctional practices and their roots in everyday social life. Recognition of these practices together with their functions and dysfunctions may hold a solid prospect for improvements in medical communication.
Notes
