Difference between revisions of "Bolden2010"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Bolden2010 | |Key=Bolden2010 | ||
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=12 | |Volume=12 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=5–32 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445609346770 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445609346770 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445609346770 | ||
|Abstract=This article provides a conversation analytic description of a previously unstudied conversational action: ‘articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of other people’s talk. Contributing to the extant research on formulations and on interactional functions of discourse markers, the article shows that and-prefaced formulations accomplish a distinct conversational action that has the following features: these formulations are assertions about the addressee’s domain of knowledge that perform a repair operation in the form of a request for confirmation; they articulate a ‘missing’ element of the addressee’s preceding talk (which is, typically, an extended informing turn); what is being formulated is claimably inferable from the prior talk; moreover, such formulations extend the addressee’s course of action on his/her behalf. The article describes compositional and sequential features of and-prefaced formulations and how they shape interactional trajectories of in-progress courses of action. | |Abstract=This article provides a conversation analytic description of a previously unstudied conversational action: ‘articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of other people’s talk. Contributing to the extant research on formulations and on interactional functions of discourse markers, the article shows that and-prefaced formulations accomplish a distinct conversational action that has the following features: these formulations are assertions about the addressee’s domain of knowledge that perform a repair operation in the form of a request for confirmation; they articulate a ‘missing’ element of the addressee’s preceding talk (which is, typically, an extended informing turn); what is being formulated is claimably inferable from the prior talk; moreover, such formulations extend the addressee’s course of action on his/her behalf. The article describes compositional and sequential features of and-prefaced formulations and how they shape interactional trajectories of in-progress courses of action. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:03, 25 November 2019
| Bolden2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bolden2010 |
| Author(s) | Galina B. Bolden |
| Title | “Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Affiliation, Confirmation requests, Discourse Markers, Formulations, Repair |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 12 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 5–32 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445609346770 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article provides a conversation analytic description of a previously unstudied conversational action: ‘articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of other people’s talk. Contributing to the extant research on formulations and on interactional functions of discourse markers, the article shows that and-prefaced formulations accomplish a distinct conversational action that has the following features: these formulations are assertions about the addressee’s domain of knowledge that perform a repair operation in the form of a request for confirmation; they articulate a ‘missing’ element of the addressee’s preceding talk (which is, typically, an extended informing turn); what is being formulated is claimably inferable from the prior talk; moreover, such formulations extend the addressee’s course of action on his/her behalf. The article describes compositional and sequential features of and-prefaced formulations and how they shape interactional trajectories of in-progress courses of action.
Notes
