Difference between revisions of "Ogden2010"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Richard Ogden; |Title=Prosodic constructions in making complaints |Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Elisabeth Reber; Margret Sel...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
|Author(s)=Richard Ogden;  
+
|Author(s)=Richard Ogden;
 
|Title=Prosodic constructions in making complaints
 
|Title=Prosodic constructions in making complaints
 
|Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Elisabeth Reber; Margret Selting;
 
|Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Elisabeth Reber; Margret Selting;
|Tag(s)=IL; Prosody; Complaints; Turn Construction;  
+
|Tag(s)=IL; Prosody; Complaints; Turn Construction;
 
|Key=Ogden2010
 
|Key=Ogden2010
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing
+
|Publisher=John Benjamins
 
|Year=2010
 
|Year=2010
 
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia
 
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia
 
|Booktitle=Prosody in Interaction
 
|Booktitle=Prosody in Interaction
 
|Pages=81–104
 
|Pages=81–104
 +
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/sidag.23.10ogd
 
|DOI=10.1075/sidag.23.10ogd
 
|DOI=10.1075/sidag.23.10ogd
 
|Note=see: Hakulinen, Auli (2010) ‘The relevance of context to the performing of a complaint: Comments on Richard Ogden “Prosodic constructions in making complaints”’. In: Dagmar  Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 105–108
 
|Note=see: Hakulinen, Auli (2010) ‘The relevance of context to the performing of a complaint: Comments on Richard Ogden “Prosodic constructions in making complaints”’. In: Dagmar  Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 105–108
 
|Abstract=What sorts of actions have phonetic exponents? Turn-taking and stance-marking can be handled phonetically: discontinuity (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen 2004a); prosodic stylisation (e.g. Ogden et al. 2004); and-uhm constructions (Local 2003); the use of ‘upgrading’ and ‘downgrading’ to mark types of agreement (Ogden 2006). Here I consider the linguistic construction of complaints based on a collection of complaints about third parties (Drew and Walker 2008). Two turn formats convey complaints. One format is designed to receive an affiliative response; the other is designed to close down a sequence. These turn types are phonetically distinct. Complaints are analysed as constructions: units of linguistic organisation that unite elements of linguistic form (including phonetics) with elements of meaning, including seeking affiliation and sequence management.
 
|Abstract=What sorts of actions have phonetic exponents? Turn-taking and stance-marking can be handled phonetically: discontinuity (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen 2004a); prosodic stylisation (e.g. Ogden et al. 2004); and-uhm constructions (Local 2003); the use of ‘upgrading’ and ‘downgrading’ to mark types of agreement (Ogden 2006). Here I consider the linguistic construction of complaints based on a collection of complaints about third parties (Drew and Walker 2008). Two turn formats convey complaints. One format is designed to receive an affiliative response; the other is designed to close down a sequence. These turn types are phonetically distinct. Complaints are analysed as constructions: units of linguistic organisation that unite elements of linguistic form (including phonetics) with elements of meaning, including seeking affiliation and sequence management.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 07:24, 25 November 2019

Ogden2010
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Ogden2010
Author(s) Richard Ogden
Title Prosodic constructions in making complaints
Editor(s) Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting
Tag(s) IL, Prosody, Complaints, Turn Construction
Publisher John Benjamins
Year 2010
Language
City Amsterdam / Philadelphia
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 81–104
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/sidag.23.10ogd
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Prosody in Interaction
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

What sorts of actions have phonetic exponents? Turn-taking and stance-marking can be handled phonetically: discontinuity (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen 2004a); prosodic stylisation (e.g. Ogden et al. 2004); and-uhm constructions (Local 2003); the use of ‘upgrading’ and ‘downgrading’ to mark types of agreement (Ogden 2006). Here I consider the linguistic construction of complaints based on a collection of complaints about third parties (Drew and Walker 2008). Two turn formats convey complaints. One format is designed to receive an affiliative response; the other is designed to close down a sequence. These turn types are phonetically distinct. Complaints are analysed as constructions: units of linguistic organisation that unite elements of linguistic form (including phonetics) with elements of meaning, including seeking affiliation and sequence management.

Notes

see: Hakulinen, Auli (2010) ‘The relevance of context to the performing of a complaint: Comments on Richard Ogden “Prosodic constructions in making complaints”’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 105–108