Difference between revisions of "Seedhouse2010a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Paul Seedhouse; |Title=Locusts, snowflakes and recasts: complexity theory and spoken interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; complexity theory; classr...")
 
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=1
 
|Volume=1
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
|Pages=4-24
+
|Pages=4–24
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1080/19463011003750624
+
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19463011003750624
 
|DOI=10.1080/19463011003750624
 
|DOI=10.1080/19463011003750624
|Abstract=Complexity theory is becoming established as a conceptual framework that is
+
|Abstract=Complexity theory is becoming established as a conceptual framework that is relevant to many areas of applied linguistics, as well as to many other academic disciplines. This article examines the extent to which spoken interaction has the characteristics of a complex adaptive system. The study commences by introducing complexity theory and its importance in understanding how non‐linear systems of all kinds function. The typical characteristics of complex adaptive systems in the human and natural world are identified. Second‐language classroom interaction is chosen for study as an example of a variety of spoken interaction since it has certain distinctive characteristics and because a description of its architecture already exists. Interaction in this setting is shown to display some characteristic features of a complex adaptive system, which are illustrated through the use of classroom data. The IRF pattern is selected for particular examination as it is the best‐known pattern in this setting. It is concluded that the study of spoken interaction as a system may benefit from the insights of complexity theory.
relevant to many areas of applied linguistics, as well as to many other academic
 
disciplines. This article examines the extent to which spoken interaction has the
 
characteristics of a complex adaptive system. The study commences by introducing
 
complexity theory and its importance in understanding how non-linear systems of
 
all kinds function. The typical characteristics of complex adaptive systems in the
 
human and natural world are identified. Second-language classroom interaction is
 
chosen for study as an example of a variety of spoken interaction since it has certain
 
distinctive characteristics and because a description of its architecture already
 
exists. Interaction in this setting is shown to display some characteristic features
 
of a complex adaptive system, which are illustrated through the use of classroom
 
data. The IRF pattern is selected for particular examination as it is the best-known
 
pattern in this setting. It is concluded that the study of spoken interaction as a
 
system may benefit from the insights of complexity theory.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 07:53, 25 November 2019

Seedhouse2010a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Seedhouse2010a
Author(s) Paul Seedhouse
Title Locusts, snowflakes and recasts: complexity theory and spoken interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, complexity theory, classroom interaction, spoken interaction, IRF exchange
Publisher
Year 2010
Language English
City
Month
Journal Classroom Discourse
Volume 1
Number 1
Pages 4–24
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/19463011003750624
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Complexity theory is becoming established as a conceptual framework that is relevant to many areas of applied linguistics, as well as to many other academic disciplines. This article examines the extent to which spoken interaction has the characteristics of a complex adaptive system. The study commences by introducing complexity theory and its importance in understanding how non‐linear systems of all kinds function. The typical characteristics of complex adaptive systems in the human and natural world are identified. Second‐language classroom interaction is chosen for study as an example of a variety of spoken interaction since it has certain distinctive characteristics and because a description of its architecture already exists. Interaction in this setting is shown to display some characteristic features of a complex adaptive system, which are illustrated through the use of classroom data. The IRF pattern is selected for particular examination as it is the best‐known pattern in this setting. It is concluded that the study of spoken interaction as a system may benefit from the insights of complexity theory.

Notes