Difference between revisions of "Fitzgerald2009b"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Richard Fitzgerald; William Housley; Carly W. Butler; |Title=Omnirelevance and interactional context |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysi...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
−
|Author(s)=Richard Fitzgerald; William Housley; Carly W. Butler;  
+
|Author(s)=Richard Fitzgerald; William Housley; Carly W. Butler;
 
|Title=Omnirelevance and interactional context
 
|Title=Omnirelevance and interactional context
−
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Membership Categorization Analysis; Context;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Membership Categorization Analysis; Context;
 
|Key=Fitzgerald2009b
 
|Key=Fitzgerald2009b
 
|Year=2009
 
|Year=2009
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=36
 
|Volume=36
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
−
|Pages=45-64
+
|Pages=45–64
−
|URL=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Fitzgerald3/publication/43516949_Omni-relevance_and_Interactional_Context/links/00b495278bb0de7258000000.pdf
+
|URL=https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=201002704;res=IELAPA
−
|Abstract=Within conversation analysis and membership categorisation analysis, 
 
−
the  warrant  for  any  instance  of  analytic  interest  is  always  the  demonstrable 
 
−
relevance and consequentiality of the phenomena to the interactants. Demonstrating 
 
−
participants’  orientations  to  social  structural  contexts  poses  methodological 
 
−
difficulties,  as  such  orientations  are  often  fragmentary,  which  weakens  the 
 
−
possibility of exploring social structural features as omnipresent and influencing the 
 
−
understandings and actions of participants. In this paper, we revisit Sacks’s (1995) 
 
−
discussion  of  omnirelevance,  in  order  to  explore  the  possibility  of  approaching 
 
−
context within a multilayering of categorical relevances. We argue that, within the 
 
−
layering of membership devices in an episode of interaction, there is an analytically 
 
−
observable orientation to an omnirelevant device. This omnirelevant device operates 
 
−
as  background  to  the  occasioned  topic  devices  as  a  kind  of  ‘default’  orientation 
 
−
that organises the participation context. The analysis draws upon a transcript of an 
 
−
(ordinary)  conversation in  which  various  touched-off  topics  generate  interactional 
 
−
and  membership  devices.  While  these  devices  are  seen  to  organise  the  topic  at 
 
−
hand, there are occasions where topic talk is suspended and a different membership 
 
−
device is oriented to. The omnirelevant device reveals itself through the cracks, joints, 
 
−
and  articulation  of  touched  off-topic  devices,  suggesting  a  layering  and  hierarchy 
 
−
of  membership  devices.  By  exploring  the  notion  of  omnirelevant  devices  within 
 
−
interaction as part of a layering of topical membership devices, this paper argues for 
 
−
the possibility of exploring a wider participant orientation within interaction and the 
 
−
warrant to analytically invoke a backgrounded organisational device.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 11:15, 23 November 2019

Fitzgerald2009b
BibType ARTICLE
Key Fitzgerald2009b
Author(s) Richard Fitzgerald, William Housley, Carly W. Butler
Title Omnirelevance and interactional context
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Membership Categorization Analysis, Context
Publisher
Year 2009
Language
City
Month
Journal Australian Journal of Communication
Volume 36
Number 3
Pages 45–64
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes


Retrieved from "https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Fitzgerald2009b&oldid=21241"