Difference between revisions of "Wells-Local2009"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Bill Wells; John Local; |Title=Prosody as an interactional resource: A clinical linguistic perspective |Tag(s)=IL; Prosody; social inte...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Bill Wells; John Local; | + | |Author(s)=Bill Wells; John Local; |
| − | |Title=Prosody as an interactional resource: | + | |Title=Prosody as an interactional resource: a clinical linguistic perspective |
|Tag(s)=IL; Prosody; social interaction; developmental; | |Tag(s)=IL; Prosody; social interaction; developmental; | ||
|Key=Wells-Local2009 | |Key=Wells-Local2009 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|Pages=321–325 | |Pages=321–325 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Sue | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17549500902960906 |
| + | |DOI=10.1080/17549500902960906 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Sue Peppé’s article (2009) surveys key issues relevant to the clinical assessment and management of prosodic aspects of spoken communication. In the first part of this commentary, we demonstrate one approach to assessment, which involves close analysis | ||
of the use of prosody in spontaneous talk-in-interaction. This approach derives from one pioneered by David Crystal, supplemented by techniques drawn from Conversation Analysis which allow for greater precision and objectivity in the characterization of prosodic meaning. The type of analysis is illustrated with data froman 11-year-old boy with severe autism. In the second part, the same data are used to illustrate how phonetic, phonological and interactional notations can be combined in a single transcription. It is suggested that this notational system can be of value in highlighting how mutual understanding can be achieved through prosody, even when one participant is not using a recognized prosodic system. The two parts of the commentary are linked by the notion that a prime function of prosodic features is to contribute to the management of turn-taking. | of the use of prosody in spontaneous talk-in-interaction. This approach derives from one pioneered by David Crystal, supplemented by techniques drawn from Conversation Analysis which allow for greater precision and objectivity in the characterization of prosodic meaning. The type of analysis is illustrated with data froman 11-year-old boy with severe autism. In the second part, the same data are used to illustrate how phonetic, phonological and interactional notations can be combined in a single transcription. It is suggested that this notational system can be of value in highlighting how mutual understanding can be achieved through prosody, even when one participant is not using a recognized prosodic system. The two parts of the commentary are linked by the notion that a prime function of prosodic features is to contribute to the management of turn-taking. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:13, 23 November 2019
| Wells-Local2009 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wells-Local2009 |
| Author(s) | Bill Wells, John Local |
| Title | Prosody as an interactional resource: a clinical linguistic perspective |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | IL, Prosody, social interaction, developmental |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2009 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, |
| Volume | 11 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 321–325 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/17549500902960906 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Sue Peppé’s article (2009) surveys key issues relevant to the clinical assessment and management of prosodic aspects of spoken communication. In the first part of this commentary, we demonstrate one approach to assessment, which involves close analysis of the use of prosody in spontaneous talk-in-interaction. This approach derives from one pioneered by David Crystal, supplemented by techniques drawn from Conversation Analysis which allow for greater precision and objectivity in the characterization of prosodic meaning. The type of analysis is illustrated with data froman 11-year-old boy with severe autism. In the second part, the same data are used to illustrate how phonetic, phonological and interactional notations can be combined in a single transcription. It is suggested that this notational system can be of value in highlighting how mutual understanding can be achieved through prosody, even when one participant is not using a recognized prosodic system. The two parts of the commentary are linked by the notion that a prime function of prosodic features is to contribute to the management of turn-taking.
Notes
