Difference between revisions of "Sidnell2008"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; |Title=Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean c...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Jack Sidnell;
 
|Author(s)=Jack Sidnell;
|Title=Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities’
+
|Title=Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; linguistic anthropology; repair; comparative studies; Caribbean
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; linguistic anthropology; repair; comparative studies; Caribbean
 
|Key=Sidnell2008
 
|Key=Sidnell2008
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=12
 
|Volume=12
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
|Pages=477-503
+
|Pages=477–503
|Abstract=This article discusses the history of relations between conversation analysis
+
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00377.x
and linguistic anthropology within the broader field encompassing various
+
|DOI=10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00377.x
approaches to language, interaction, and social life. It argues that although
+
|Abstract=This article discusses the history of relations between conversation analysis and linguistic anthropology within the broader field encompassing various approaches to language, interaction, and social life. It argues that although these relations have, at times, been fraught and marked by rather serious misconceptions of what conversation analysis is all about, there is still much to be gained from cooperation and scholarly exchange between these approaches. An illustration of this argument focuses on the organization of other‐initiated repair in two Caribbean communities.
these relations have, at times, been fraught and marked by rather serious
 
misconceptions of what conversation analysis is all about, there is still
 
much to be gained from cooperation and scholarly exchange between these
 
approaches. An illustration of this argument focuses on the organization of
 
other-initiated repair in two Caribbean communities.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 12:25, 20 November 2019

Sidnell2008
BibType ARTICLE
Key Sidnell2008
Author(s) Jack Sidnell
Title Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation analysis, linguistic anthropology, repair, comparative studies, Caribbean
Publisher
Year 2008
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Sociolinguistics
Volume 12
Number 4
Pages 477–503
URL Link
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00377.x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article discusses the history of relations between conversation analysis and linguistic anthropology within the broader field encompassing various approaches to language, interaction, and social life. It argues that although these relations have, at times, been fraught and marked by rather serious misconceptions of what conversation analysis is all about, there is still much to be gained from cooperation and scholarly exchange between these approaches. An illustration of this argument focuses on the organization of other‐initiated repair in two Caribbean communities.

Notes