Difference between revisions of "Stockill-Kitzinger2007"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Clare Stockill; Celia Kitzinger; |Title= Gendered `People': How Linguistically Non-gendered Terms Can Have Gendered Interactional Rele...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Clare Stockill; Celia Kitzinger; | + | |Author(s)=Clare Stockill; Celia Kitzinger; |
− | |Title= | + | |Title=Gendered 'People': How Linguistically Non-gendered Terms Can Have Gendered Interactional Relevance |
− | Gendered | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gender; Person Reference; |
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gender; Person Reference; | ||
|Key=Stockill-Kitzinger2007 | |Key=Stockill-Kitzinger2007 | ||
|Year=2007 | |Year=2007 | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=17 | |Volume=17 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=224–236 |
− | | | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0959353507076555 |
− | |Abstract=Drawing on a case study of a single data extract, this article uses conversation analysis (CA) to explore the use of: (1) gendered linguistic terms ( | + | |DOI=10.1177/0959353507076555 |
+ | |Abstract=Drawing on a case study of a single data extract, this article uses conversation analysis (CA) to explore the use of: (1) gendered linguistic terms ('girls' and 'boys') that are treated as relevantly interactionally gendered by the participants; (2) use of a linguistically non-gendered term ('people') that is not treated as relevantly interactionally gendered; (3) use of a linguistically gendered term ('man') that is not treated as relevantly interactionally gendered; and (4) use of a linguistically non-gendered term ('people') that is treated as relevantly interactionally gendered by the participants. Our analysis shows that the interactional meaning of gender is not intrinsic to gendered linguistic forms, but to the action a linguistic form is used to do on any given occasion of use. This contributes to the development of feminist CA and to the understanding of how gender is constructed in talk-in-interaction, as well as more generally to conversation analytic work on membership categorization and person reference. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 14:45, 17 November 2019
Stockill-Kitzinger2007 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Stockill-Kitzinger2007 |
Author(s) | Clare Stockill, Celia Kitzinger |
Title | Gendered 'People': How Linguistically Non-gendered Terms Can Have Gendered Interactional Relevance |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Gender, Person Reference |
Publisher | |
Year | 2007 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Feminism & Psychology |
Volume | 17 |
Number | 2 |
Pages | 224–236 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0959353507076555 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Drawing on a case study of a single data extract, this article uses conversation analysis (CA) to explore the use of: (1) gendered linguistic terms ('girls' and 'boys') that are treated as relevantly interactionally gendered by the participants; (2) use of a linguistically non-gendered term ('people') that is not treated as relevantly interactionally gendered; (3) use of a linguistically gendered term ('man') that is not treated as relevantly interactionally gendered; and (4) use of a linguistically non-gendered term ('people') that is treated as relevantly interactionally gendered by the participants. Our analysis shows that the interactional meaning of gender is not intrinsic to gendered linguistic forms, but to the action a linguistic form is used to do on any given occasion of use. This contributes to the development of feminist CA and to the understanding of how gender is constructed in talk-in-interaction, as well as more generally to conversation analytic work on membership categorization and person reference.
Notes