Difference between revisions of "Llewellyn2006"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn; |Title=Arguing against absent arguables: Organizing audience participation in political discourse |Tag(s)=EMCA; Convers...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn;  
+
|Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn;
|Title=Arguing against absent arguables: Organizing audience participation in political discourse
+
|Title=Arguing against absent arguables: organizing audience participation in political discourse
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Politics; Meetings; Participation;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Politics; Meetings; Participation;
 
|Key=Llewellyn2006
 
|Key=Llewellyn2006
 
|Year=2006
 
|Year=2006
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Volume=8
 
|Volume=8
|Pages=603-626
+
|Number=5
 +
|Pages=603–626
 
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445606064832
 
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445606064832
 +
|DOI=10.1177/1461445606064832
 
|Abstract=Based on the analysis of interaction during a public meeting, this article considers how people argue in sequential environments where direct interaction is precluded. The meeting in question was organized so the turns of audience speakers and local authority representatives were produced during different periods; initial actions and their oppositions, counters, etc., could be separated by anything up to 25 minutes. The article describes how speakers adapt their language practices to construct arguing turns and series of action-opposition pairs in social settings thus organized.
 
|Abstract=Based on the analysis of interaction during a public meeting, this article considers how people argue in sequential environments where direct interaction is precluded. The meeting in question was organized so the turns of audience speakers and local authority representatives were produced during different periods; initial actions and their oppositions, counters, etc., could be separated by anything up to 25 minutes. The article describes how speakers adapt their language practices to construct arguing turns and series of action-opposition pairs in social settings thus organized.
 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:04, 13 November 2019

Llewellyn2006
BibType ARTICLE
Key Llewellyn2006
Author(s) Nick Llewellyn
Title Arguing against absent arguables: organizing audience participation in political discourse
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Politics, Meetings, Participation
Publisher
Year 2006
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 8
Number 5
Pages 603–626
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445606064832
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Based on the analysis of interaction during a public meeting, this article considers how people argue in sequential environments where direct interaction is precluded. The meeting in question was organized so the turns of audience speakers and local authority representatives were produced during different periods; initial actions and their oppositions, counters, etc., could be separated by anything up to 25 minutes. The article describes how speakers adapt their language practices to construct arguing turns and series of action-opposition pairs in social settings thus organized.

Notes