Difference between revisions of "Robinson2006a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jeffrey D. Robinson; |Title=Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships During Conversational Repair |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation An...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Jeffrey D. Robinson;
 
|Author(s)=Jeffrey D. Robinson;
|Title=Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships During Conversational Repair
+
|Title=Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Intersubjectivity; Repair; Relationship; Responsibility; Practice
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Intersubjectivity; Repair; Relationship; Responsibility; Practice
 
|Key=Robinson2006a
 
|Key=Robinson2006a
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=73
 
|Volume=73
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
|Pages=137 — 161
+
|Pages=137–161
|URL=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750600581206
+
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03637750600581206
 
|DOI=10.1080/03637750600581206
 
|DOI=10.1080/03637750600581206
|Abstract=Using conversation analysis, this article focuses on other-initiation of repair (e.g., What?,
+
|Abstract=Using conversation analysis, this article focuses on other-initiation of repair (e.g., What?, I'm sorry?) of trouble speaking, hearing, and understanding. This article shows that the act of managing relationships is an essential feature of other-initiation of repair, and that different practices of repair-initiation can constitute different relational events that have different behavioral outcomes. Specifically, this article: (1) argues that context-free structures of interaction bias practices of repair such that other-initiated repair is vulnerable to communicating a stance that responsibility for trouble belongs to the speaker of the talk that inspired the repair-initiation; (2) discusses the implications of trouble responsibility for interpersonal disalignment and the organization of subsequent interaction; and (3) focuses on open-class (Drew, 1997) practices of repair initiation and argues that the apology-based format (I'm sorry? or Sorry?) communicates a stance that trouble responsibility belongs to repair-initiators, rather than to their addressees.
I’m sorry?) of trouble speaking, hearing, and understanding. This article shows that the
 
act of managing relationships is an essential feature of other-initiation of repair, and that
 
different practices of repair-initiation can constitute different relational events that have
 
different behavioral outcomes. Specifically, this article: (1) argues that context-free
 
structures of interaction bias practices of repair such that other-initiated repair is
 
vulnerable to communicating a stance that responsibility for trouble belongs to the
 
speaker of the talk that inspired the repair-initiation; (2) discusses the implications of
 
trouble responsibility for interpersonal disalignment and the organization of subsequent
 
interaction; and (3) focuses on open-class (Drew, 1997) practices of repair initiation and
 
argues that the apology-based format (I’m sorry? or Sorry?) communicates a stance that
 
trouble responsibility belongs to repair-initiators, rather than to their addressees.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:07, 13 November 2019

Robinson2006a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Robinson2006a
Author(s) Jeffrey D. Robinson
Title Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Intersubjectivity, Repair, Relationship, Responsibility, Practice
Publisher
Year 2006
Language English
City
Month
Journal Communication Monographs
Volume 73
Number 2
Pages 137–161
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/03637750600581206
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Using conversation analysis, this article focuses on other-initiation of repair (e.g., What?, I'm sorry?) of trouble speaking, hearing, and understanding. This article shows that the act of managing relationships is an essential feature of other-initiation of repair, and that different practices of repair-initiation can constitute different relational events that have different behavioral outcomes. Specifically, this article: (1) argues that context-free structures of interaction bias practices of repair such that other-initiated repair is vulnerable to communicating a stance that responsibility for trouble belongs to the speaker of the talk that inspired the repair-initiation; (2) discusses the implications of trouble responsibility for interpersonal disalignment and the organization of subsequent interaction; and (3) focuses on open-class (Drew, 1997) practices of repair initiation and argues that the apology-based format (I'm sorry? or Sorry?) communicates a stance that trouble responsibility belongs to repair-initiators, rather than to their addressees.

Notes