Difference between revisions of "Wooffitt2005c"
EdwardHolmes (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Robin Wooffitt; Simon Allistone; |Title=Towards a discursive parapsychology: language and the laboratory study of anomalous communicati...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Robin Wooffitt; Simon Allistone; | + | |Author(s)=Robin Wooffitt; Simon Allistone; |
|Title=Towards a discursive parapsychology: language and the laboratory study of anomalous communication | |Title=Towards a discursive parapsychology: language and the laboratory study of anomalous communication | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Parapsychology; Discursive Psychology; ESP | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Parapsychology; Discursive Psychology; ESP | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Volume=15 | |Volume=15 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=325–355 |
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959354305053218 | |URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959354305053218 | ||
− | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1177/0959354305053218 |
|Abstract=In recent years there has been a change in attitudes among psychologists and social scientists towards ostensibly paranormal experiences in general, and parapsychological research in particular. Instead of seeking to endorse or debunk claims of paranormal experience, attention has shifted to the analysis of the broader psychological, social and cultural implications of reports of anomalous phenomena. This paper contributes to this trend by arguing for a discursive psychological study of interaction between experimenter and subject in parapsychology laboratory experiments. Parapsychological experiments rely on mundane interactional practices which invoke the relevance of, or make explicit reference to, psychological and parapsychological states. These laboratory interactions can be investigated by conversation-analytic-informed discursive psychology. Some preliminary observations on data from ganzfeld ESP experiments are offered to illustrate the range of empirical issues which may be explored. These concern the socially organized properties of reports of conscious imagery; the use of a psychological thesaurus as part of the experimenter’s work; and the management of affiliation in experimenter-subject interaction. These observations suggest that discursive psychological research can be undertaken despite the controversial status of evidence for extra-sensorimotor communication. The paper argues that the discursive psychological studies of interaction in parapsychological experiments can yield findings relevant to the concerns of both parapsychology and discursive psychology, and can contribute to methodological issues in the broader study of consciousness. | |Abstract=In recent years there has been a change in attitudes among psychologists and social scientists towards ostensibly paranormal experiences in general, and parapsychological research in particular. Instead of seeking to endorse or debunk claims of paranormal experience, attention has shifted to the analysis of the broader psychological, social and cultural implications of reports of anomalous phenomena. This paper contributes to this trend by arguing for a discursive psychological study of interaction between experimenter and subject in parapsychology laboratory experiments. Parapsychological experiments rely on mundane interactional practices which invoke the relevance of, or make explicit reference to, psychological and parapsychological states. These laboratory interactions can be investigated by conversation-analytic-informed discursive psychology. Some preliminary observations on data from ganzfeld ESP experiments are offered to illustrate the range of empirical issues which may be explored. These concern the socially organized properties of reports of conscious imagery; the use of a psychological thesaurus as part of the experimenter’s work; and the management of affiliation in experimenter-subject interaction. These observations suggest that discursive psychological research can be undertaken despite the controversial status of evidence for extra-sensorimotor communication. The paper argues that the discursive psychological studies of interaction in parapsychological experiments can yield findings relevant to the concerns of both parapsychology and discursive psychology, and can contribute to methodological issues in the broader study of consciousness. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:41, 2 November 2019
Wooffitt2005c | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Wooffitt2005c |
Author(s) | Robin Wooffitt, Simon Allistone |
Title | Towards a discursive parapsychology: language and the laboratory study of anomalous communication |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Parapsychology, Discursive Psychology, ESP |
Publisher | |
Year | 2005 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | June |
Journal | Theory and Psychology |
Volume | 15 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 325–355 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0959354305053218 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In recent years there has been a change in attitudes among psychologists and social scientists towards ostensibly paranormal experiences in general, and parapsychological research in particular. Instead of seeking to endorse or debunk claims of paranormal experience, attention has shifted to the analysis of the broader psychological, social and cultural implications of reports of anomalous phenomena. This paper contributes to this trend by arguing for a discursive psychological study of interaction between experimenter and subject in parapsychology laboratory experiments. Parapsychological experiments rely on mundane interactional practices which invoke the relevance of, or make explicit reference to, psychological and parapsychological states. These laboratory interactions can be investigated by conversation-analytic-informed discursive psychology. Some preliminary observations on data from ganzfeld ESP experiments are offered to illustrate the range of empirical issues which may be explored. These concern the socially organized properties of reports of conscious imagery; the use of a psychological thesaurus as part of the experimenter’s work; and the management of affiliation in experimenter-subject interaction. These observations suggest that discursive psychological research can be undertaken despite the controversial status of evidence for extra-sensorimotor communication. The paper argues that the discursive psychological studies of interaction in parapsychological experiments can yield findings relevant to the concerns of both parapsychology and discursive psychology, and can contribute to methodological issues in the broader study of consciousness.
Notes