Difference between revisions of "Garot2004"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Robert Garot |Title=“You’re Not a Stone”: Emotional Sensitivity in a Bureaucratic Setting |Tag(s)=EMCA; phenomenology; emotion man...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Robert Garot | |Author(s)=Robert Garot | ||
− | |Title=“You’re | + | |Title=“You’re not a stone”: emotional sensitivity in a bureaucratic setting |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; phenomenology; emotion management; human service work; housing; anger; crying; office culture; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; phenomenology; emotion management; human service work; housing; anger; crying; office culture; | ||
|Key=Garot2004 | |Key=Garot2004 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=33 | |Volume=33 | ||
|Number=6 | |Number=6 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=735–766 |
− | | | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891241604269326 |
+ | |DOI=10.1177/0891241604269326 | ||
|Abstract=Although the emotion management perspective dominates the micro-sociological study of emotions, a phenomenological approach provides access to phenomena that are inaccessible through emotion management. While the former shows the strategic management of one’s emotions to conform to norms, the latter reveals the myriad ways in which emotions move us. Indeed, if not for the poignant resonance of emotions in social life, emotions would hardly be worth “managing.” This article will employ a phenomenological perspective on emotions as they were expressed by applicants and workers in a Section 8 housing office throughout the course of eligibility interviews. I will show that despite giving off an impression of detachment and neutrality, workers are unavoidably sensitive to the emotional displays of applicants. Hence, a research agenda focusing on interpersonal emotional sensitivity is proposed as a complement to the conceptualization of emotions as managed. | |Abstract=Although the emotion management perspective dominates the micro-sociological study of emotions, a phenomenological approach provides access to phenomena that are inaccessible through emotion management. While the former shows the strategic management of one’s emotions to conform to norms, the latter reveals the myriad ways in which emotions move us. Indeed, if not for the poignant resonance of emotions in social life, emotions would hardly be worth “managing.” This article will employ a phenomenological perspective on emotions as they were expressed by applicants and workers in a Section 8 housing office throughout the course of eligibility interviews. I will show that despite giving off an impression of detachment and neutrality, workers are unavoidably sensitive to the emotional displays of applicants. Hence, a research agenda focusing on interpersonal emotional sensitivity is proposed as a complement to the conceptualization of emotions as managed. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:48, 1 November 2019
Garot2004 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Garot2004 |
Author(s) | Robert Garot |
Title | “You’re not a stone”: emotional sensitivity in a bureaucratic setting |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, phenomenology, emotion management, human service work, housing, anger, crying, office culture |
Publisher | |
Year | 2004 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Contemporary Ethnography |
Volume | 33 |
Number | 6 |
Pages | 735–766 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0891241604269326 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Although the emotion management perspective dominates the micro-sociological study of emotions, a phenomenological approach provides access to phenomena that are inaccessible through emotion management. While the former shows the strategic management of one’s emotions to conform to norms, the latter reveals the myriad ways in which emotions move us. Indeed, if not for the poignant resonance of emotions in social life, emotions would hardly be worth “managing.” This article will employ a phenomenological perspective on emotions as they were expressed by applicants and workers in a Section 8 housing office throughout the course of eligibility interviews. I will show that despite giving off an impression of detachment and neutrality, workers are unavoidably sensitive to the emotional displays of applicants. Hence, a research agenda focusing on interpersonal emotional sensitivity is proposed as a complement to the conceptualization of emotions as managed.
Notes