Difference between revisions of "Llewellyn2004"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn; |Title=In Search of Modernization: The Negotiation of Social Identity in Organizational Reform |Tag(s)=EMCA; membership...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn; | + | |Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn; |
| − | |Title=In | + | |Title=In search of modernization: the negotiation of social identity in organizational reform |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; membership categorization analysis; UK local government; organizational identity; public-sector reform; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; membership categorization analysis; UK local government; organizational identity; public-sector reform; | ||
|Key=Llewellyn2004 | |Key=Llewellyn2004 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=6 | |Number=6 | ||
|Pages=947–968 | |Pages=947–968 | ||
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840604040677 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/0170840604040677 | |DOI=10.1177/0170840604040677 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Based on the analysis of two short documents, this article considers how social | + | |Abstract=Based on the analysis of two short documents, this article considers how social categories, such as bureaucracy, council, business, and so on, are utilized in descriptions of project work. Specifically, it examines the locally occasioned interpretative practices that enabled a single project (in a UK local authority) to be described as modernizing the way services were delivered. In part, this involved negotiating the category ‘bureaucratic’, with the author often reasoning it would be somehow misleading to use such a category to describe the project. The article focuses on the negotiation of social categories and on the work done to present aspects of the project as ‘documents’ (Garfinkel 1967) of the authority’s category membership, as ‘in keeping’ with what would be expected of such a type. Categorization, the act of tying specific events to social types or categories, is shown to be a significant resource in accounting for the character of project work. The article adds to debates on organizational identity and public-sector reform by examining members’ commonsense knowledge of various social categories and by illustrating the role of categorization in shaping how various organizational phenomena are understood. |
| − | categories, such as bureaucracy, council, business, and so on, are utilized in | ||
| − | |||
| − | practices that enabled a single project (in a UK local authority) to be described as | ||
| − | modernizing the way services were delivered. In part, this involved negotiating the | ||
| − | category ‘bureaucratic’, with the author often reasoning it would be somehow | ||
| − | misleading to use such a category to describe the project. The article focuses on the | ||
| − | negotiation of social categories and on the work done to present aspects of the project | ||
| − | as ‘documents’ ( | ||
| − | keeping’ with what would be expected of such a type. Categorization, the act of tying | ||
| − | |||
| − | in accounting for the character of project work. The article adds to debates on | ||
| − | organizational identity and public-sector reform by examining members’ | ||
| − | |||
| − | categorization in shaping how various organizational phenomena are understood. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:27, 1 November 2019
| Llewellyn2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Llewellyn2004 |
| Author(s) | Nick Llewellyn |
| Title | In search of modernization: the negotiation of social identity in organizational reform |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, membership categorization analysis, UK local government, organizational identity, public-sector reform |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Organization Studies |
| Volume | 25 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 947–968 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0170840604040677 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Based on the analysis of two short documents, this article considers how social categories, such as bureaucracy, council, business, and so on, are utilized in descriptions of project work. Specifically, it examines the locally occasioned interpretative practices that enabled a single project (in a UK local authority) to be described as modernizing the way services were delivered. In part, this involved negotiating the category ‘bureaucratic’, with the author often reasoning it would be somehow misleading to use such a category to describe the project. The article focuses on the negotiation of social categories and on the work done to present aspects of the project as ‘documents’ (Garfinkel 1967) of the authority’s category membership, as ‘in keeping’ with what would be expected of such a type. Categorization, the act of tying specific events to social types or categories, is shown to be a significant resource in accounting for the character of project work. The article adds to debates on organizational identity and public-sector reform by examining members’ commonsense knowledge of various social categories and by illustrating the role of categorization in shaping how various organizational phenomena are understood.
Notes
