Difference between revisions of "Lutfey2004"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Karen Lutfey |Title=Assessment, objectivity, and interaction: The case of patient compliance with medical treatment regimens |Tag(s)=EMC...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Karen Lutfey | |Author(s)=Karen Lutfey | ||
| − | |Title=Assessment, objectivity, and interaction: | + | |Title=Assessment, objectivity, and interaction: the case of patient compliance with medical treatment regimens |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Assessments; Compliance; Drug treatment; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Assessments; Compliance; Drug treatment; |
|Key=Lutfey2004 | |Key=Lutfey2004 | ||
|Year=2004 | |Year=2004 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=67 | |Volume=67 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=343–368 |
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/019027250406700402 | |URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/019027250406700402 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1177/019027250406700402 | ||
|Abstract=Much of the daily work of professional organizations is accomplished via interaction between representatives of those institutions and laypeople. Scholars of talk in institutional settings have argued that lay-professional interaction is often assumed mistakenly to operate as a neutral conduit for professionals to gain information relevant to their work. I use the case of doctor-patient interaction to examine how patient compliance with diabetes treatment is assessed in interaction. Despite the abundance of research on patient compliance, the approaches to this work show a conceptual uniformity stemming from the notion that noncompliance is a matter of individually based, essential behaviors. Using conversation analysis, I draw attention to the ways in which compliance is produced jointly in and through institutional talk. As a result, I seek to elaborate two extant literatures: interdisciplinary research on patient compliance as an aspect of health behavior, and social psychological literature on attitudes and behavior. | |Abstract=Much of the daily work of professional organizations is accomplished via interaction between representatives of those institutions and laypeople. Scholars of talk in institutional settings have argued that lay-professional interaction is often assumed mistakenly to operate as a neutral conduit for professionals to gain information relevant to their work. I use the case of doctor-patient interaction to examine how patient compliance with diabetes treatment is assessed in interaction. Despite the abundance of research on patient compliance, the approaches to this work show a conceptual uniformity stemming from the notion that noncompliance is a matter of individually based, essential behaviors. Using conversation analysis, I draw attention to the ways in which compliance is produced jointly in and through institutional talk. As a result, I seek to elaborate two extant literatures: interdisciplinary research on patient compliance as an aspect of health behavior, and social psychological literature on attitudes and behavior. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:18, 1 November 2019
| Lutfey2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Lutfey2004 |
| Author(s) | Karen Lutfey |
| Title | Assessment, objectivity, and interaction: the case of patient compliance with medical treatment regimens |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Assessments, Compliance, Drug treatment |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Psychology Quarterly |
| Volume | 67 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 343–368 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/019027250406700402 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Much of the daily work of professional organizations is accomplished via interaction between representatives of those institutions and laypeople. Scholars of talk in institutional settings have argued that lay-professional interaction is often assumed mistakenly to operate as a neutral conduit for professionals to gain information relevant to their work. I use the case of doctor-patient interaction to examine how patient compliance with diabetes treatment is assessed in interaction. Despite the abundance of research on patient compliance, the approaches to this work show a conceptual uniformity stemming from the notion that noncompliance is a matter of individually based, essential behaviors. Using conversation analysis, I draw attention to the ways in which compliance is produced jointly in and through institutional talk. As a result, I seek to elaborate two extant literatures: interdisciplinary research on patient compliance as an aspect of health behavior, and social psychological literature on attitudes and behavior.
Notes
