Difference between revisions of "Robinson2004"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jeffrey D. Robinson; |Title=The Sequential Organization of "Explicit" Apologies in Naturally Occurring English |Tag(s)=EMCA; Apologies;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Jeffrey D. Robinson; | |Author(s)=Jeffrey D. Robinson; | ||
| − | |Title=The | + | |Title=The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurring English |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Apologies; Sequential Organization | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Apologies; Sequential Organization | ||
|Key=Robinson2004 | |Key=Robinson2004 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=291–330 | |Pages=291–330 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2 |
|DOI=10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2 | |DOI=10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2 | ||
| − | |Abstract=In this article, I use | + | |Abstract=In this article, I use the method of conversation analysis and data from American- and British-English conversation to analyze the sequential organization of "explicit" apologies (e.g., I'm sorry, and I must apologize). I demonstrate that (a) apologies can occupy a number of different sequential positions, with different ramifications for the organization of apologizing as an action; (b) apologies can be first parts of adjacency-pair sequences; (c) apologies index particular offenses and embody a claim to have offended someone; (d) As first-pair parts, apologies have a preference organization such that preferred responses mitigate or undermine, and dispreferred responses endorse, apologies' claims to have caused offense; and (e) apology terms can be used to accomplish nonapology actions. In this article, I contribute to our understanding of the social and sequential organization of talk in interaction as well as communication practices dealing with the maintenance of social/relational harmony. |
| − | British-English conversation to analyze the sequential organization of | ||
| − | apologies (e.g., | ||
| − | occupy a number of different sequential positions,with different ramifications for the | ||
| − | organization of apologizing as an action; (b) apologies can be first parts of | ||
| − | |||
| − | have offended someone; (d) As first-pair parts, apologies have a preference | ||
| − | |||
| − | endorse, | ||
| − | to accomplish nonapology actions. In this article, I contribute to our understanding of | ||
| − | the social and sequential organization of talk in interaction as well as communication | ||
| − | practices dealing with the maintenance of social/relational harmony. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:18, 1 November 2019
| Robinson2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Robinson2004 |
| Author(s) | Jeffrey D. Robinson |
| Title | The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurring English |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Apologies, Sequential Organization |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 37 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 291–330 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this article, I use the method of conversation analysis and data from American- and British-English conversation to analyze the sequential organization of "explicit" apologies (e.g., I'm sorry, and I must apologize). I demonstrate that (a) apologies can occupy a number of different sequential positions, with different ramifications for the organization of apologizing as an action; (b) apologies can be first parts of adjacency-pair sequences; (c) apologies index particular offenses and embody a claim to have offended someone; (d) As first-pair parts, apologies have a preference organization such that preferred responses mitigate or undermine, and dispreferred responses endorse, apologies' claims to have caused offense; and (e) apology terms can be used to accomplish nonapology actions. In this article, I contribute to our understanding of the social and sequential organization of talk in interaction as well as communication practices dealing with the maintenance of social/relational harmony.
Notes
