Difference between revisions of "Schegloff2000b"
(BibTeX auto import 2014-10-01 10:14:03) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
+ | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
+ | |Author(s)=Emanuel A Schegloff; | ||
+ | |Title=When 'Others' Initiate Repair | ||
+ | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | ||
|Key=Schegloff2000b | |Key=Schegloff2000b | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|Year=2000 | |Year=2000 | ||
|Journal=Applied Linguistics | |Journal=Applied Linguistics |
Revision as of 10:40, 13 October 2014
Schegloff2000b | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Schegloff2000b |
Author(s) | Emanuel A Schegloff |
Title | When 'Others' Initiate Repair |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA |
Publisher | |
Year | 2000 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Applied Linguistics |
Volume | 21 |
Number | |
Pages | 205–243 |
URL | |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Early work on repair (Schegloff et al. 1977) had proposed that virtually all repair initiated by other than speaker of the trouble-source turn was initiated in the turn following the trouble-source turn. Such repair often came to be identified with this locus of initiation, being termed NTRI - an acronym derived from 'next turn repair initiation'. Subsequent work (Schegloff 1992) described another location in which 'other- initiated repair' is initiated-termed 'fourth position'. This paper revisits this issue and elaborates the locus of other-initiated repair. It reports on a number of environments in which 'others' initiate repair in turns later than the one directly following the trouble-source turn (without, however, occupying fourth position), and it describes several ways in which other- initiation of repair which occurs in next-turn position may be delayed within that position. These positionings of repair initiation in conversation among native speakers of English are briefly compared with a proposal by Wong that other-initiated repair by non-nativespeakers may regularly be delayed. A postscript suggests the prospect that studies of non-native speaker participation in talk-in-interaction be treated as not separable from the study of talk-in-interaction more generally.
Notes