Difference between revisions of "Koshik2002a"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Irene Koshik; |Title=Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequ...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Irene Koshik; | + | |Author(s)=Irene Koshik; |
| − | |Title=Designedly incomplete utterances: | + | |Title=Designedly incomplete utterances: a pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Classroom interactions; Self-Correction; Designedly incomplete utterances; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Classroom interactions; Self-Correction; Designedly incomplete utterances; |
|Key=Koshik2002a | |Key=Koshik2002a | ||
|Year=2002 | |Year=2002 | ||
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | ||
|Volume=35 | |Volume=35 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| + | |Pages=277–309 | ||
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 |
| − | |Abstract= | + | |Abstract=This article uses a conversation analytic framework to analyze a practice used by teachers in 1-on-1, second-language writing conferences when eliciting self-correction of students' written language errors. This type of turn, used to elicit a knowledge display from the student, is not a syntactic question or even a complete turn constructional unit. It is designed to be incomplete; hence the name designedly incomplete utterance (DIU). The teachers use DIUs made up of the students' own words to begin turns that they are prompting the students to complete. Several types of DIU are discussed, showing how their turn design is related to the action they are being used to do. DIUs are then compared to similar practices found in ordinary conversation (i.e., word searches and anticipatory completions), showing how DIUs are adaptations of these practices to accomplish specialized institutional tasks. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | This article uses a conversation analytic framework to analyze a practice used by teachers in 1-on-1, second-language writing conferences when eliciting self-correction of students' written language errors. This type of turn, used to elicit a knowledge display from the student, is not a syntactic question or even a complete turn constructional unit. It is designed to be incomplete; hence the name designedly incomplete utterance (DIU). The teachers use DIUs made up of the students' own words to begin turns that they are prompting the students to complete. Several types of DIU are discussed, showing how their turn design is related to the action they are being used to do. DIUs are then compared to similar practices found in ordinary conversation (i.e., word searches and anticipatory completions), showing how DIUs are adaptations of these practices to accomplish specialized institutional tasks. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:02, 30 October 2019
| Koshik2002a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Koshik2002a |
| Author(s) | Irene Koshik |
| Title | Designedly incomplete utterances: a pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Classroom interactions, Self-Correction, Designedly incomplete utterances |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 35 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 277–309 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article uses a conversation analytic framework to analyze a practice used by teachers in 1-on-1, second-language writing conferences when eliciting self-correction of students' written language errors. This type of turn, used to elicit a knowledge display from the student, is not a syntactic question or even a complete turn constructional unit. It is designed to be incomplete; hence the name designedly incomplete utterance (DIU). The teachers use DIUs made up of the students' own words to begin turns that they are prompting the students to complete. Several types of DIU are discussed, showing how their turn design is related to the action they are being used to do. DIUs are then compared to similar practices found in ordinary conversation (i.e., word searches and anticipatory completions), showing how DIUs are adaptations of these practices to accomplish specialized institutional tasks.
Notes
