Difference between revisions of "Honan2000"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Eileen Honan; Michele Knobel; Carolyn Baker; Bronwyn Davies |Title=Producing possible Hannahs: Theory and the subject of research |Tag(s...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Eileen Honan; Michele Knobel; Carolyn Baker; Bronwyn Davies | |Author(s)=Eileen Honan; Michele Knobel; Carolyn Baker; Bronwyn Davies | ||
| − | |Title=Producing possible Hannahs: | + | |Title=Producing possible Hannahs: theory and the subject of research |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnography; Qualitative methods; Research Subjects | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnography; Qualitative methods; Research Subjects | ||
|Key=Honan2000 | |Key=Honan2000 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=6 | |Volume=6 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=9–32 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/107780040000600102 |
|DOI=10.1177/107780040000600102 | |DOI=10.1177/107780040000600102 | ||
|Abstract=This article presents and compares three analyses of qualitative data drawn from an ethnographic case study using distinctive theoretical approaches. The article shows the power of theoretical approaches to constitute the “subject” of a study and to constitute the character of the social world in which such a subject is situated. The three readings of the data produce different possible subjects located in differently constituted possible worlds. By putting theory at the center of analysis, the article shows how theoretical approaches radically influence what can be found in the data and how it can be found there. | |Abstract=This article presents and compares three analyses of qualitative data drawn from an ethnographic case study using distinctive theoretical approaches. The article shows the power of theoretical approaches to constitute the “subject” of a study and to constitute the character of the social world in which such a subject is situated. The three readings of the data produce different possible subjects located in differently constituted possible worlds. By putting theory at the center of analysis, the article shows how theoretical approaches radically influence what can be found in the data and how it can be found there. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:54, 27 October 2019
| Honan2000 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Honan2000 |
| Author(s) | Eileen Honan, Michele Knobel, Carolyn Baker, Bronwyn Davies |
| Title | Producing possible Hannahs: theory and the subject of research |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnography, Qualitative methods, Research Subjects |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Inquiry |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 9–32 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/107780040000600102 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article presents and compares three analyses of qualitative data drawn from an ethnographic case study using distinctive theoretical approaches. The article shows the power of theoretical approaches to constitute the “subject” of a study and to constitute the character of the social world in which such a subject is situated. The three readings of the data produce different possible subjects located in differently constituted possible worlds. By putting theory at the center of analysis, the article shows how theoretical approaches radically influence what can be found in the data and how it can be found there.
Notes
