Difference between revisions of "OConnell-Kowal1994"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Daniel C. O'Connell; Sabine Kowal; |Title=Some Current Transcription Systems For Spoken Discourse: A Critical Analysis |Tag(s)=EMCA...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
−
|Author(s)=Daniel C. O'Connell; Sabine Kowal;
+
|Author(s)=Daniel C. O'Connell; Sabine Kowal;
−
|Title=Some Current  Transcription  Systems For  Spoken Discourse: A Critical  Analysis
+
|Title=Some current transcription systems for spoken discourse: a critical analysis
−
|Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Transcription; Jefferson;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Transcription; Jefferson;
 
|Key=O'Connell-Kowal1994
 
|Key=O'Connell-Kowal1994
 
|Year=1994
 
|Year=1994
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=4
 
|Volume=4
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
−
|Pages=81-107
+
|Pages=81–107
−
|Abstract=In  recent  decades,  a  rather disparate  array of  transcription  systems,  all  alike
+
|URL=https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.4.1.04con
−
intended  to make  the  transient  reality  of spoken  discourse  accessible  to the eyes  of researchers,  have  found their way into  the literature  of  several  related  fields of research,  including  linguistics,  sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and
+
|DOI=10.1075/prag.4.1.04con
−
ethnomethodology.
 
−
Until recently,  the usefulness  and adequacy  of  these  various  transcription
 
−
systems  have  been  largely  taken  for granted,  but in the past  several  years  they  have begun  to attract  attention  to  themselves  as  sources  of research  problems  in  their own  right  rather  than  as  practical  intermediate  steps  toward  making  data  accessible.
 
−
In  the  following,  we  first present  the  various  criteria  required  by  the authors
 
−
of  these  systems  if they  are  to be used  effectively  and adequately. We then  review in detail  the use  of one specific  sign  for the notation  of oral communicative  behavior. For  this  review  we have  chosen  the sign  "h" (or,  in some  cases,  "H") because in  the  various  transcription  systems,  it  is  the one sign  that happens  to be used  to represent  in one way or another  all four aspects  of oral communicative  behavior verbal,  prosodic,  paralinguistic,  and extralinguistic  (...).  The primary  use,  however,  is paralinguistic. In a third step  we analyze  various  aspect of "h"  in view of  its usefulness  and adequacy  as a sign  for  the  transcription  of spoken  discourse. And  finally  we derive  conclusions  from our review  and analyse for  the  further  development  of transcription  systems.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 01:24, 24 October 2019

OConnell-Kowal1994
BibType ARTICLE
Key O'Connell-Kowal1994
Author(s) Daniel C. O'Connell, Sabine Kowal
Title Some current transcription systems for spoken discourse: a critical analysis
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, IL, Transcription, Jefferson
Publisher
Year 1994
Language
City
Month
Journal Pragmatics
Volume 4
Number 1
Pages 81–107
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/prag.4.1.04con
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes


Retrieved from "https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=OConnell-Kowal1994&oldid=19029"