Difference between revisions of "Thomason-Hopper1992"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=W.Ray Thomason; Robert Hopper; |Title=Pauses, Transition Relevance, and Speaker Change |Tag(s)=EMCA; Pauses; Transition Relevance; Speak...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=W.Ray Thomason; Robert Hopper; | + | |Author(s)=W. Ray Thomason; Robert Hopper; |
| − | |Title=Pauses, | + | |Title=Pauses, transition relevance, and speaker change |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Pauses; Transition Relevance; Speaker Change; Quantitative methods | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Pauses; Transition Relevance; Speaker Change; Quantitative methods | ||
|Key=Thomason-Hopper1992 | |Key=Thomason-Hopper1992 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=429–444 | |Pages=429–444 | ||
| + | |URL=https://academic.oup.com/hcr/article-abstract/18/3/429/4575821 | ||
|DOI=10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00559.x | |DOI=10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00559.x | ||
|Abstract=The relationship between transition relevance and speaker change, although accepted among conversation analysts, has not to date been the focus of quantitative description. The present researchers cross-tabulated transition relevance and speaker change in the environment of conversational pauses. These procedures produced strong statistical corroboration of the sociological reality of transition relevance. Additionally, analyses of exceptional instances (e.g., speaker change following non-transition-relevant pauses) show that the participants mark these as exceptional. | |Abstract=The relationship between transition relevance and speaker change, although accepted among conversation analysts, has not to date been the focus of quantitative description. The present researchers cross-tabulated transition relevance and speaker change in the environment of conversational pauses. These procedures produced strong statistical corroboration of the sociological reality of transition relevance. Additionally, analyses of exceptional instances (e.g., speaker change following non-transition-relevant pauses) show that the participants mark these as exceptional. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:31, 23 October 2019
| Thomason-Hopper1992 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Thomason-Hopper1992 |
| Author(s) | W. Ray Thomason, Robert Hopper |
| Title | Pauses, transition relevance, and speaker change |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Pauses, Transition Relevance, Speaker Change, Quantitative methods |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1992 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Communication Research |
| Volume | 18 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 429–444 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00559.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The relationship between transition relevance and speaker change, although accepted among conversation analysts, has not to date been the focus of quantitative description. The present researchers cross-tabulated transition relevance and speaker change in the environment of conversational pauses. These procedures produced strong statistical corroboration of the sociological reality of transition relevance. Additionally, analyses of exceptional instances (e.g., speaker change following non-transition-relevant pauses) show that the participants mark these as exceptional.
Notes
