Difference between revisions of "Lutfey1998"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Karen Luftey; Douglas W. Maynard; |Title=Bad news in oncology: How physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Karen Luftey; Douglas W. Maynard;  
+
|Author(s)=Karen Luftey; Douglas W. Maynard;
 
|Title=Bad news in oncology: How physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words
 
|Title=Bad news in oncology: How physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Medical Interview; Death; Dying; Oncology;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Medical Interview; Death; Dying; Oncology;
 
|Key=Lutfey1998
 
|Key=Lutfey1998
 
|Year=1998
 
|Year=1998
 
|Journal=Social Psychology Quarterly
 
|Journal=Social Psychology Quarterly
 
|Volume=61
 
|Volume=61
|Pages=321-341
+
|Number=4
|URL=ttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2787033
+
|Pages=321–341
 +
|URL=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2787033
 +
|DOI=10.2307/2787033
 
|Abstract=We focus on the socialization of patients to the process of death and dying by examining actual interactions among medical practitioners, patients, and their family members. Our data consist of three medical interviews. In each one, the oncologist delivers the news that the patient's cancer is no longer treatable. Although not stated, the implied message is that the patient will soon die. Because, in these episodes, the same doctor is attempting to convey a similar message to three different patients, we can compare the ways in which the patients respond to the message and thus affect the delivery of the news. In various practical ways, both physician and patient exhibit interactional caution in discussing death and dying.
 
|Abstract=We focus on the socialization of patients to the process of death and dying by examining actual interactions among medical practitioners, patients, and their family members. Our data consist of three medical interviews. In each one, the oncologist delivers the news that the patient's cancer is no longer treatable. Although not stated, the implied message is that the patient will soon die. Because, in these episodes, the same doctor is attempting to convey a similar message to three different patients, we can compare the ways in which the patients respond to the message and thus affect the delivery of the news. In various practical ways, both physician and patient exhibit interactional caution in discussing death and dying.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 00:42, 20 October 2019

Lutfey1998
BibType ARTICLE
Key Lutfey1998
Author(s) Karen Luftey, Douglas W. Maynard
Title Bad news in oncology: How physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical EMCA, Medical Interview, Death, Dying, Oncology
Publisher
Year 1998
Language
City
Month
Journal Social Psychology Quarterly
Volume 61
Number 4
Pages 321–341
URL Link
DOI 10.2307/2787033
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

We focus on the socialization of patients to the process of death and dying by examining actual interactions among medical practitioners, patients, and their family members. Our data consist of three medical interviews. In each one, the oncologist delivers the news that the patient's cancer is no longer treatable. Although not stated, the implied message is that the patient will soon die. Because, in these episodes, the same doctor is attempting to convey a similar message to three different patients, we can compare the ways in which the patients respond to the message and thus affect the delivery of the news. In various practical ways, both physician and patient exhibit interactional caution in discussing death and dying.

Notes