Difference between revisions of "Matoesian2001"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=BOOK |Author(s)=Gregory M. Matoesian |Title=Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trail |Tag(s)=EMCA; Rape; Law; Id...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=BOOK | |BibType=BOOK | ||
|Author(s)=Gregory M. Matoesian | |Author(s)=Gregory M. Matoesian | ||
− | |Title=Law and the | + | |Title=Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trail |
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Rape; Law; Identity; Courtroom Interaction; Trials; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Rape; Law; Identity; Courtroom Interaction; Trials; |
|Key=Matoesian2001 | |Key=Matoesian2001 | ||
|Publisher=Oxford University Press | |Publisher=Oxford University Press | ||
|Year=2001 | |Year=2001 | ||
|Address=Oxford | |Address=Oxford | ||
+ | |URL=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/law-and-the-language-of-identity-9780195123302 | ||
+ | |Abstract=In this volume, Gregory Matoesian uses the notorious 1991 rape trial of William Kennedy Smith to provide an in-depth analysis of language use and its role in that specific trial as well as in the law in general. He draws on the fields of conversation analysis, ethnomethodology, linguistic anthropology and social theory to show how language practices shape—and are shaped by—culture and the law, particularly in the social construction of rape as a legal fact. This analysis examines linguistic strategies from both defence and prosecution viewpoints, and how they relate to issues of gender, sexual identity, and power. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 00:53, 19 October 2019
Matoesian2001 | |
---|---|
BibType | BOOK |
Key | Matoesian2001 |
Author(s) | Gregory M. Matoesian |
Title | Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trail |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Rape, Law, Identity, Courtroom Interaction, Trials |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Year | 2001 |
Language | |
City | Oxford |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In this volume, Gregory Matoesian uses the notorious 1991 rape trial of William Kennedy Smith to provide an in-depth analysis of language use and its role in that specific trial as well as in the law in general. He draws on the fields of conversation analysis, ethnomethodology, linguistic anthropology and social theory to show how language practices shape—and are shaped by—culture and the law, particularly in the social construction of rape as a legal fact. This analysis examines linguistic strategies from both defence and prosecution viewpoints, and how they relate to issues of gender, sexual identity, and power.
Notes