Difference between revisions of "Stivers-Hayashi2010"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Tanya Stivers; Makoto Hayashi; |Title=Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation A...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Tanya Stivers; Makoto Hayashi; | |Author(s)=Tanya Stivers; Makoto Hayashi; | ||
| − | |Title=Transformative answers: | + | |Title=Transformative answers: one way to resist a question’s constraints |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; social interaction; alignment; affiliation; Japanese; evasion | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; social interaction; alignment; affiliation; Japanese; evasion | ||
|Key=Stivers-Hayashi2010 | |Key=Stivers-Hayashi2010 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=39 | |Volume=39 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=1–25 |
| + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/transformative-answers-one-way-to-resist-a-questions-constraints/9E6D5D278DB9C09A92CB2E9D7A834040 | ||
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404509990637 | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404509990637 | ||
| − | |Abstract=A number of Conversation Analytic studies have documented that question | + | |Abstract=A number of Conversation Analytic studies have documented that question recipients have a variety of ways to push against the constraints that questions impose on them. This article explores the concept of transformative answers – answers through which question recipients retroactively adjust the question posed to them. Two main sorts of adjustments are discussed: question term transformations and question agenda transformations. It is shown that the operations through which interactants implement term transformations are different from the operations through which they implement agenda transformations. Moreover, term-transforming answers resist only the question’s design, while agenda-transforming answers effectively resist both design and agenda, thus implying that agenda-transforming answers resist more strongly than design-transforming answers. The implications of these different sorts of transformations for alignment and affiliation are then explored. |
| − | recipients have a variety of ways to push against the constraints that questions | ||
| − | impose on them. This article explores the concept of transformative answers – | ||
| − | answers through which question recipients retroactively adjust the question | ||
| − | posed to them. Two main sorts of adjustments are discussed: question term | ||
| − | transformations and question agenda transformations. It is shown that the | ||
| − | operations through which interactants implement term transformations are | ||
| − | different from the operations through which they implement agenda | ||
| − | |||
| − | design, while agenda-transforming answers effectively resist both design | ||
| − | and agenda, thus implying that agenda-transforming answers resist more | ||
| − | strongly than design-transforming answers. The implications of these | ||
| − | different sorts of transformations for alignment and | ||
| − | explored. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:38, 18 October 2019
| Stivers-Hayashi2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stivers-Hayashi2010 |
| Author(s) | Tanya Stivers, Makoto Hayashi |
| Title | Transformative answers: one way to resist a question’s constraints |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, social interaction, alignment, affiliation, Japanese, evasion |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 39 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1–25 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404509990637 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A number of Conversation Analytic studies have documented that question recipients have a variety of ways to push against the constraints that questions impose on them. This article explores the concept of transformative answers – answers through which question recipients retroactively adjust the question posed to them. Two main sorts of adjustments are discussed: question term transformations and question agenda transformations. It is shown that the operations through which interactants implement term transformations are different from the operations through which they implement agenda transformations. Moreover, term-transforming answers resist only the question’s design, while agenda-transforming answers effectively resist both design and agenda, thus implying that agenda-transforming answers resist more strongly than design-transforming answers. The implications of these different sorts of transformations for alignment and affiliation are then explored.
Notes
