Difference between revisions of "Dowling-etal2019"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sandra Dowling; Val Williams; Joe Webb; Marina Gall; Deborah Worrall |Title=Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with i...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Sandra Dowling; Val Williams; Joe Webb; Marina Gall; Deborah Worrall | |Author(s)=Sandra Dowling; Val Williams; Joe Webb; Marina Gall; Deborah Worrall | ||
| − | |Title=Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with | + | |Title=Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with intellectual disabilities |
| − | intellectual disabilities | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Decision making; Mental capacity; Relational autonomy; Support practices; Intellectual disabilities |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | ||
|Key=Dowling-etal2019 | |Key=Dowling-etal2019 | ||
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities | |Journal=Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities | ||
| − | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ | + | |Volume=32 |
| + | |Number=5 | ||
| + | |Pages=1058–1066 | ||
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jar.12595 | ||
|DOI=10.1111/jar.12595 | |DOI=10.1111/jar.12595 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Background | + | |Abstract=Background |
| − | + | This article is about interactions that occur when someone with intellectual disabilities is engaged in everyday activities with a personal assistant (PA) or a support worker. | |
| − | support worker. | + | |
| − | Method | + | Method |
| − | interactions, to explore how “relational autonomy” is done in practice. Nine people | + | We examine the detail of nine hours of naturally occurring video‐recorded interactions, to explore how “relational autonomy” is done in practice. Nine people with ID and seven staff took part in the research, which took place in England from 2016–17. |
| − | with ID and seven staff took part in the research, which took place in England from | + | |
| − | 2016–17. | + | Results |
| − | Results | + | We selected six extracts to illustrate different types of joint decision‐making. Informed by inclusive research with a drama group of people with intellectual disabilities, we focus on the ways in which (a) future plans are discussed; (b) choices are offered during an activity; (c) people reflect on their decisions. |
| − | + | ||
| − | disabilities, we focus on the ways in which (a) future plans are discussed; (b) choices | + | Conclusion |
| − | are offered during an activity; (c) people reflect on their decisions. | + | The article concludes with discussion about the teaching and learning content of choice‐making, on relational autonomy, and the practice learning for PAs, support workers and for people with intellectual disabilities. |
| − | Conclusion | ||
| − | content of choice‐making, on relational autonomy, and the practice learning for PAs, | ||
| − | support workers and for people with intellectual disabilities. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:50, 17 October 2019
| Dowling-etal2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Dowling-etal2019 |
| Author(s) | Sandra Dowling, Val Williams, Joe Webb, Marina Gall, Deborah Worrall |
| Title | Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with intellectual disabilities |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Decision making, Mental capacity, Relational autonomy, Support practices, Intellectual disabilities |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities |
| Volume | 32 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 1058–1066 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/jar.12595 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Background This article is about interactions that occur when someone with intellectual disabilities is engaged in everyday activities with a personal assistant (PA) or a support worker.
Method We examine the detail of nine hours of naturally occurring video‐recorded interactions, to explore how “relational autonomy” is done in practice. Nine people with ID and seven staff took part in the research, which took place in England from 2016–17.
Results We selected six extracts to illustrate different types of joint decision‐making. Informed by inclusive research with a drama group of people with intellectual disabilities, we focus on the ways in which (a) future plans are discussed; (b) choices are offered during an activity; (c) people reflect on their decisions.
Conclusion The article concludes with discussion about the teaching and learning content of choice‐making, on relational autonomy, and the practice learning for PAs, support workers and for people with intellectual disabilities.
Notes
