Difference between revisions of "Pollner1991"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Melvin Pollner; |Title=Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Politics;...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Melvin Pollner; | + | |Author(s)=Melvin Pollner; |
|Title=Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity | |Title=Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Politics; Reflexivity; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Politics; Reflexivity; |
|Key=Pollner1991 | |Key=Pollner1991 | ||
|Year=1991 | |Year=1991 | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096110 | |URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096110 | ||
|DOI=10.2307/2096110 | |DOI=10.2307/2096110 | ||
+ | |Abstract=The growing recognition of ethnomethodology has come at the expense of one of its most | ||
+ | original and promising initiatives - radical reflexivity. Although prominent in early ethnomethodological work, the recognition that all renderings of reality - including those of the social scientist-are contingent accomplishments has diminished in contemporary studies. I describe the emergence and fall of radical reflexivity within ethnomethodology, the processes contributing to its diminishing role, and the implications of the decline. Because radical reflexivity breaches the taken-for-granted practices of disciplines purporting to describe reality, it is a vital resource for ethnomethodology and sociology generally. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 03:26, 22 July 2019
Pollner1991 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Pollner1991 |
Author(s) | Melvin Pollner |
Title | Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Politics, Reflexivity |
Publisher | |
Year | 1991 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | American Sociological Review |
Volume | 56 |
Number | |
Pages | 370-380 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.2307/2096110 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
The growing recognition of ethnomethodology has come at the expense of one of its most original and promising initiatives - radical reflexivity. Although prominent in early ethnomethodological work, the recognition that all renderings of reality - including those of the social scientist-are contingent accomplishments has diminished in contemporary studies. I describe the emergence and fall of radical reflexivity within ethnomethodology, the processes contributing to its diminishing role, and the implications of the decline. Because radical reflexivity breaches the taken-for-granted practices of disciplines purporting to describe reality, it is a vital resource for ethnomethodology and sociology generally.
Notes