Difference between revisions of "Stoenica2016"
(BibTeX auto import 2018-10-31 10:49:00) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Ioana-Maria Stoenica; | ||
| + | |Title=Grammaire-en-interaction: le potentiel praxéologique des relatives dans les conversations en français | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=interactional linguistics; referent; relative clause; social actions | ||
|Key=Stoenica2016 | |Key=Stoenica2016 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
| + | |Language=French | ||
|Journal=Bulletin VALS-ASLA | |Journal=Bulletin VALS-ASLA | ||
|Volume=104 | |Volume=104 | ||
Revision as of 03:49, 31 October 2018
| Stoenica2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stoenica2016 |
| Author(s) | Ioana-Maria Stoenica |
| Title | Grammaire-en-interaction: le potentiel praxéologique des relatives dans les conversations en français |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | interactional linguistics, referent, relative clause, social actions |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | French |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Bulletin VALS-ASLA |
| Volume | 104 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 87–103 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper offers an interactional linguistic account of the us e of relative clauses (RCs) in French talk- in-interaction. Drawing on 9 hrs of audio and video recorded co nversations, this work investigates the use of RCs in two distinct syntactic patterns: a) [RC], where t he RC forms a turn on its own and is produced by another speaker than that of the host turn; b) [nou n phrase + RC] that is produced as a standalone segment, without being syntactically linked to any h ost turn or clause. Detailed sequential analyses show that participants use these two turn patterns in order to accomplish different actions: a) to take a stand on what has been previously said by another spe aker; b) to accomplish membership categorization so as to emphasize the incongruity between their normative status and their actual behavior in the given circumstances. This paper stands thus as a contribution to recent discussions on the temporal and praxeological dimension of grammar in naturall y occurring talk-interaction (see Thompson, Fox \& Couper-Kuhlen 2015; Pekarek Doehler, De Stefani \& Horlacher 2015 inter alia ).
Notes
