Difference between revisions of "Schegloff1973"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Emanuel A. Schegloff; Harvey Sacks; | |Author(s)=Emanuel A. Schegloff; Harvey Sacks; | ||
|Title=Opening up closings | |Title=Opening up closings | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation closing; Conversation Analysis |
|Key=Schegloff1973 | |Key=Schegloff1973 | ||
|Year=1973 | |Year=1973 | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/semi.1973.8.issue-4/semi.1973.8.4.289/semi.1973.8.4.289.xml | |URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/semi.1973.8.issue-4/semi.1973.8.4.289/semi.1973.8.4.289.xml | ||
|DOI=10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 | |DOI=10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Our aim in this paper is to report in a preliminary fashion on analyses | ||
| + | we have been developing of closings of conversation. Although it may | ||
| + | be apparent to intuition that the unit *a single conversation' does not | ||
| + | simply end, but is brought to a close, our initial task is to develop a | ||
| + | technical basis for a closing problem. This we try to derive from a | ||
| + | consideration of some features of the most basic sequential organization | ||
| + | of conversation we know of — the organization of speaker turns. A | ||
| + | partial solution of this problem is developed, employing resources drawn | ||
| + | from the same order of organization. The incompleteness ofthat solution | ||
| + | is shown, and leads to an elaboration of the problem, which requires | ||
| + | reference to quite different orders of sequential organization in conversa- | ||
| + | tion — in particular, the organization of topic talk, and the overall | ||
| + | structural organization of the unit 'a single conversation'. The reformu- | ||
| + | lated problem is used to locate a much broader range of data as relevant | ||
| + | to the problem of closings, and some of that data is discussed in detail. | ||
| + | Finally, an attempt is made to specify the domain for which the closing | ||
| + | problems, as we have posed them, seem apposite. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:22, 24 September 2018
| Schegloff1973 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Schegloff1973 |
| Author(s) | Emanuel A. Schegloff, Harvey Sacks |
| Title | Opening up closings |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation closing, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1973 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Semiotica |
| Volume | 8 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 289–327 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Our aim in this paper is to report in a preliminary fashion on analyses we have been developing of closings of conversation. Although it may be apparent to intuition that the unit *a single conversation' does not simply end, but is brought to a close, our initial task is to develop a technical basis for a closing problem. This we try to derive from a consideration of some features of the most basic sequential organization of conversation we know of — the organization of speaker turns. A partial solution of this problem is developed, employing resources drawn from the same order of organization. The incompleteness ofthat solution is shown, and leads to an elaboration of the problem, which requires reference to quite different orders of sequential organization in conversa- tion — in particular, the organization of topic talk, and the overall structural organization of the unit 'a single conversation'. The reformu- lated problem is used to locate a much broader range of data as relevant to the problem of closings, and some of that data is discussed in detail. Finally, an attempt is made to specify the domain for which the closing problems, as we have posed them, seem apposite.
Notes
