Difference between revisions of "Ekberg-etal2017"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Stuart Ekberg; Susan Danby; Anthony Herbert; Natalie K. Bradford; Patsy Yates |Title=Affording opportunities to discuss deterioration in...") |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Stuart Ekberg; Susan Danby; Anthony Herbert; Natalie K. Bradford; Patsy Yates | |Author(s)=Stuart Ekberg; Susan Danby; Anthony Herbert; Natalie K. Bradford; Patsy Yates | ||
|Title=Affording opportunities to discuss deterioration in paediatric palliative care consultations: A conversation analytic study | |Title=Affording opportunities to discuss deterioration in paediatric palliative care consultations: A conversation analytic study | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Palliative care; Medical EMCA; In Press; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Palliative care; Medical EMCA; In Press; Medical EMCA |
|Key=Ekberg-etal2017 | |Key=Ekberg-etal2017 | ||
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
|Journal=BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care | |Journal=BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care | ||
|URL=http://eprints.qut.edu.au/102986/ | |URL=http://eprints.qut.edu.au/102986/ | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001130 | ||
|Abstract=Objective | |Abstract=Objective | ||
Revision as of 00:58, 6 September 2018
| Ekberg-etal2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ekberg-etal2017 |
| Author(s) | Stuart Ekberg, Susan Danby, Anthony Herbert, Natalie K. Bradford, Patsy Yates |
| Title | Affording opportunities to discuss deterioration in paediatric palliative care consultations: A conversation analytic study |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Palliative care, Medical EMCA, In Press, Medical EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001130 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Objective
Discussing the potential deterioration of a child who has a life-limiting condition has recognised benefits for future care, but can be challenging in a clinical context where uncertain illness trajectories are common. Existing research is restricted to indirect forms of evidence such as self-report data from clinicians and families. This study directly explores how discussions about deterioration are managed within actual paediatric palliative care consultations.
Methods
Nine consultations were video recorded in an Australian paediatric palliative care service. Each consultation involved the same paediatric palliative care specialist. Conversation analysis was used to identify and explore recurrent ways in which discussions about deterioration came to be realised.
Findings
The study identified two communicative practices used by a paediatric palliative care specialist that afforded opportunities to discuss deterioration:
1) soliciting the family’s agenda for the consultation;
2) initiating and maintaining topics where discussing deterioration is a relevant possibility.
Across these different practices, a common feature was indirect initiation of discussions about deterioration. This approach made such discussions possible, but without mandating or even suggesting that such discussion must occur.
Conclusions
These communicative practices balance the benefit of discussing deterioration against a recognised importance of allowing discussions to be directed by a child’s family. This was achieved by creating opportunities for discussing deterioration, without making such discussions necessary.
Notes
