Difference between revisions of "Raymond2006a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Geoffrey Raymond; John Heritage; |Title=The epistemics of social relationships: Owning grandchildren |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysi...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:31, 14 June 2018

Raymond2006a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Raymond2006a
Author(s) Geoffrey Raymond, John Heritage
Title The epistemics of social relationships: Owning grandchildren
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Epistemics, Relationships, Identity
Publisher
Year 2006
Language English
City
Month
Journal Language in Society
Volume 35
Number 5
Pages 677-705
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Scholars have long understood that linkages between the identities of actors and the design of their actions in interaction constitute one of the central mechanisms by which social patterns are produced. Although a range of empirical approaches has successfully grounded claims regarding the significance of various forms or types of identity (gender, sex, race, ethnicity, class, familial status, etc.) in almost every form of social organization, these analyses have mostly focused on aggregated populations, aggregated interactions, or historical periods that have been (in different ways) abstracted from the particulars of singular episodes of interaction. By contrast, establishing the mechanisms by which a specific identity is made relevant and consequential in any particular episode of interaction has remained much more elusive. This article develops a range of general analytic resources for explicating how participants in an interaction can make relevant and consequential specific identities in particular courses of action. It then illustrates the use of these analytic resources by examining a phone call between two friends, one of whom relevantly embodies “grandparent” as an identity. The conclusion offers observations prompted by this analysis regarding basic contingencies that characterize self-other relationships, and the role of generic grammatical resources in establishing specific identities and intimate relationships.

Notes