Difference between revisions of "Cerovic2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marijana Cerovic' |Title=When suspects ask questions: Rhetorical questions as a challenging device |Tag(s)=EMCA; Police interrogation; R...")
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marijana Cerovic'
+
|Author(s)=Marijana Cerović
 
|Title=When suspects ask questions: Rhetorical questions as a challenging device
 
|Title=When suspects ask questions: Rhetorical questions as a challenging device
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Police interrogation; Rhetorical questions; Suspect; Challenging; Serbo-Croatian
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Police interrogation; Rhetorical questions; Suspect; Challenging; Serbo-Croatian
 
|Key=Cerovic2016
 
|Key=Cerovic2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
 +
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
 
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
 
|Volume=105
 
|Volume=105
|Pages=18-38
+
|Pages=18–38
|DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.010
+
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616300261
 +
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.010
 
|Abstract=This article explores the use of rhetorical questions by suspects in police interrogations, a practice which departs from the norm whereby detectives are the ones who ask questions. Suspects’ rhetorical questions occur in an argumentative sequential environment as a response to the detectives’ initial damaging turns. They oppose the detectives by means of the suspects’ primary access to what they are being accused of and are heard as strong statements of opposite polarity which issue a challenge. Contrary to the commonly held opinion that rhetorical questions do not need to be answered,most of the suspects’ rhetorical questions are treated as challenges and are counter-challenged by the detectives.
 
|Abstract=This article explores the use of rhetorical questions by suspects in police interrogations, a practice which departs from the norm whereby detectives are the ones who ask questions. Suspects’ rhetorical questions occur in an argumentative sequential environment as a response to the detectives’ initial damaging turns. They oppose the detectives by means of the suspects’ primary access to what they are being accused of and are heard as strong statements of opposite polarity which issue a challenge. Contrary to the commonly held opinion that rhetorical questions do not need to be answered,most of the suspects’ rhetorical questions are treated as challenges and are counter-challenged by the detectives.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 00:21, 29 May 2018

Cerovic2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Cerovic2016
Author(s) Marijana Cerović
Title When suspects ask questions: Rhetorical questions as a challenging device
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Police interrogation, Rhetorical questions, Suspect, Challenging, Serbo-Croatian
Publisher
Year 2016
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 105
Number
Pages 18–38
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.010
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article explores the use of rhetorical questions by suspects in police interrogations, a practice which departs from the norm whereby detectives are the ones who ask questions. Suspects’ rhetorical questions occur in an argumentative sequential environment as a response to the detectives’ initial damaging turns. They oppose the detectives by means of the suspects’ primary access to what they are being accused of and are heard as strong statements of opposite polarity which issue a challenge. Contrary to the commonly held opinion that rhetorical questions do not need to be answered,most of the suspects’ rhetorical questions are treated as challenges and are counter-challenged by the detectives.

Notes