Difference between revisions of "Ekberg2012"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis" to "Conversation Analysis") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Stuart Ekberg; | |Author(s)=Stuart Ekberg; | ||
|Title=Addressing a source of trouble outside of the repair space | |Title=Addressing a source of trouble outside of the repair space | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Trouble Source; Repair; Conversation | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Trouble Source; Repair; Conversation Analysis, Post-completion account; Repair space; Intersubjectivity; Talk-in-interaction. |
|Key=Ekberg2012 | |Key=Ekberg2012 | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
Revision as of 05:16, 19 May 2018
| Ekberg2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ekberg2012 |
| Author(s) | Stuart Ekberg |
| Title | Addressing a source of trouble outside of the repair space |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Trouble Source, Repair, Conversation Analysis, Post-completion account, Repair space, Intersubjectivity, Talk-in-interaction. |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 44 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 374-386 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A body of research in Conversation Analysis has identified a range of structurally-provided positions in which sources of trouble in talk-in-interaction can be addressed using repair. These practices are contained within what Schegloff (1992) calls the repair space. In this paper, I examine a rare instance in which a source of trouble is not resolved within the repair space and comes to be addressed outside of it. The practice by which this occurs is a post-completion account; that is, an account that is produced after the possible completion of the sequence containing a source of trouble. Unlike fourth position repair, the final repair position available within the repair space, this account is not made in preparation for a revised response to the trouble-source turn. Its more restrictive aim, rather, is to circumvent an ongoing difference between the parties involved. I argue that because the trouble is addressed in this manner, and in this particular position, the repair space can be considered as being limited to the sequence in which a source of trouble originates.
Notes
