Difference between revisions of "Hoey-Kendrick2017"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Kobin H. Kendrick; |Title=Conversation Analysis |Editor(s)=A. M. B. De Groot; Peter Hagoort |Tag(s)=EMCA; Practical gu...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
− | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
− | |Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Kobin H. Kendrick; | + | |Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Kobin H. Kendrick; |
|Title=Conversation Analysis | |Title=Conversation Analysis | ||
|Editor(s)=A. M. B. De Groot; Peter Hagoort | |Editor(s)=A. M. B. De Groot; Peter Hagoort | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://www.mpi.nl/publications/escidoc-2328034 | |URL=http://www.mpi.nl/publications/escidoc-2328034 | ||
|Abstract=Conversation Analysis (CA) is an inductive, micro-analytic, and predominantly qualitative method for studying human social interactions. This chapter describes and illustrates the basic methods of CA. We first situate the method by describing its sociological foundations, key areas of analysis, and particular approach in using naturally occurring data. The bulk of the chapter is devoted to practical explanations of the typical conversation analytic process for collecting data and producing an analysis. We analyze a candidate interactional practice – the assessmentimplicative interrogative – using real data extracts as a demonstration of the method, explicitly laying out the relevant questions and considerations for every stage of an analysis. The chapter concludes with some discussion of quantitative approaches to conversational interaction, and links between CA and psycholinguistic concerns | |Abstract=Conversation Analysis (CA) is an inductive, micro-analytic, and predominantly qualitative method for studying human social interactions. This chapter describes and illustrates the basic methods of CA. We first situate the method by describing its sociological foundations, key areas of analysis, and particular approach in using naturally occurring data. The bulk of the chapter is devoted to practical explanations of the typical conversation analytic process for collecting data and producing an analysis. We analyze a candidate interactional practice – the assessmentimplicative interrogative – using real data extracts as a demonstration of the method, explicitly laying out the relevant questions and considerations for every stage of an analysis. The chapter concludes with some discussion of quantitative approaches to conversational interaction, and links between CA and psycholinguistic concerns | ||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 01:00, 9 May 2018
Hoey-Kendrick2017 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Hoey-Kendrick2017 |
Author(s) | Elliott M. Hoey, Kobin H. Kendrick |
Title | Conversation Analysis |
Editor(s) | A. M. B. De Groot, Peter Hagoort |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Practical guide, Handbook |
Publisher | |
Year | 2017 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 151-173 |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide |
Chapter |
Abstract
Conversation Analysis (CA) is an inductive, micro-analytic, and predominantly qualitative method for studying human social interactions. This chapter describes and illustrates the basic methods of CA. We first situate the method by describing its sociological foundations, key areas of analysis, and particular approach in using naturally occurring data. The bulk of the chapter is devoted to practical explanations of the typical conversation analytic process for collecting data and producing an analysis. We analyze a candidate interactional practice – the assessmentimplicative interrogative – using real data extracts as a demonstration of the method, explicitly laying out the relevant questions and considerations for every stage of an analysis. The chapter concludes with some discussion of quantitative approaches to conversational interaction, and links between CA and psycholinguistic concerns
Notes