Difference between revisions of "Nishizaka2017b"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Aug Nishizaka; |Title=A sentence dispersed within a turn-at-talk: Response-opportunity places as loci for interactional work |Tag(s)=EM...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 17:12, 31 January 2018
| Nishizaka2017b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Nishizaka2017b |
| Author(s) | Aug Nishizaka |
| Title | A sentence dispersed within a turn-at-talk: Response-opportunity places as loci for interactional work |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Japanese, Response opportunity places, Interactional Linguistics, Grammar |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | East Asian Pragmatics |
| Volume | 2 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 229-258 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.34561 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The aim of this study is to show that there is orderliness in a piece of talk that is extremely complex and, in so doing, to explore the grammatical construction of naturally occurring, and contingently produced, utterances in Japanese interaction. First, I distinguish between unit-completeness and turn-completeness. Second, I introduce the notion of response-opportunity places to indicate those places in which although the ongoing talk is still both unit- and turn-incomplete, responses may be produced. These places are systematically used as loci for initiating solutions to various possible interactional problems, such as problems of hearing and understanding. Third, I examine different practices through which the speaker returns to the incomplete turn-constructional unit. The orderliness of the target talk is the result of the speaker’s systematic use of these places and practices.
Notes
