Difference between revisions of "Ekstroem2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Anna Ekström; |Title=Epistemic positioning and frameworks for participation: Learning to assess objects of craft in teacher education...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 08:53, 17 January 2018
Ekstroem2013 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Ekstroem2013 |
Author(s) | Anna Ekström |
Title | Epistemic positioning and frameworks for participation: Learning to assess objects of craft in teacher education |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Peer assessment, Teacher education, Participation framework, Epistemic positioning, Interaction |
Publisher | |
Year | 2013 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Learning, Culture and Social Interaction |
Volume | 2 |
Number | |
Pages | 277-292 |
URL | |
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.10.002 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This study investigates peer assessment in teacher education with a focus on the interactive organisation of such activities. As part of teacher education, peer assessment is not only used in teaching and learning of subjectmatter, but can also serve as a learning exercisewhere assessment competences are taught and attended to. In peer assessment, students engage in educational activities under conditions that differ from other classroom interaction: while participating in the activities as students, they are at the same time involved in teaching and assessing their peers — activities commonly associated with teachers. Studying this kind of educational activity places a focus on participation and interactional positions: to what extent are students able to participate in this kind of activity as teachers and in what ways do they orient towards their positions as students? The analyses show a multi-dimensional interactive organisation with both dynamic and static components. Interactional arrangements with shifting participation frameworks and changing interactive positions are at work simultaneously as a more stable organisational pattern related to educational interaction.
Notes